Evaluating approaches to diagnosis and management of idiopathic acute pancreatitis
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd..
INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) is a diagnosis of exclusion; systematic work-up is challenging but essential. Recent advances suggest IAP results from micro-choledocholithiasis, and that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) may prevent recurrence.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with IAP from 2015-21 were identified from discharge billing records. Acute pancreatitis was defined by the 2012 Atlanta classification. Complete workup was defined per Dutch and Japanese guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 1499 patients were diagnosed with IAP; 455 screened positive for pancreatitis. Most (N = 256, 56.2%) were screened for hypertriglyceridemia, 182 (40.0%) for IgG-4, and 18 (4.0%) MRCP or EUS, leaving 434 (29.0%) patients with potentially idiopathic pancreatitis. Only 61 (14.0%) received LC and 16 (3.7%) ES. Overall, 40% (N = 172) had recurrent pancreatitis versus 46% (N = 28/61) following LC and 19% (N = 3/16) following ES. Forty-three percent had stones on pathology after LC; none developed recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Complete workup for IAP is necessary but was performed in <5% of cases. Patients who potentially had IAP and received LC were definitively treated 60% of the time. The high rate of stones on pathology further supports empiric LC in this population. A systematic approach to IAP is lacking. Interventions aimed at biliary-lithiasis to prevent recurrent IAP have merit.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:25 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association - 25(2023), 10 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 1187-1194 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Wehrle, Chase J [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 29.09.2023 Date Revised 02.10.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.016 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM357139542 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM357139542 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226071940.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.016 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1190.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM357139542 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)37211463 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1365-182X(23)00133-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wehrle, Chase J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating approaches to diagnosis and management of idiopathic acute pancreatitis |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 29.09.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.10.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. | ||
520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) is a diagnosis of exclusion; systematic work-up is challenging but essential. Recent advances suggest IAP results from micro-choledocholithiasis, and that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) may prevent recurrence | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Patients diagnosed with IAP from 2015-21 were identified from discharge billing records. Acute pancreatitis was defined by the 2012 Atlanta classification. Complete workup was defined per Dutch and Japanese guidelines | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 1499 patients were diagnosed with IAP; 455 screened positive for pancreatitis. Most (N = 256, 56.2%) were screened for hypertriglyceridemia, 182 (40.0%) for IgG-4, and 18 (4.0%) MRCP or EUS, leaving 434 (29.0%) patients with potentially idiopathic pancreatitis. Only 61 (14.0%) received LC and 16 (3.7%) ES. Overall, 40% (N = 172) had recurrent pancreatitis versus 46% (N = 28/61) following LC and 19% (N = 3/16) following ES. Forty-three percent had stones on pathology after LC; none developed recurrence | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Complete workup for IAP is necessary but was performed in <5% of cases. Patients who potentially had IAP and received LC were definitively treated 60% of the time. The high rate of stones on pathology further supports empiric LC in this population. A systematic approach to IAP is lacking. Interventions aimed at biliary-lithiasis to prevent recurrent IAP have merit | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Stackhouse, Kathryn A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chang, Jenny |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hossain, Mir S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McMichael, John |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Roy, Mayank |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Augustin, Toms |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Naffouje, Samer |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Joyce, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Simon, Robert |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Walsh, R Matthew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association |d 2001 |g 25(2023), 10 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 1187-1194 |w (DE-627)NLM178147761 |x 1477-2574 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2023 |g number:10 |g day:01 |g month:10 |g pages:1187-1194 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.016 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 25 |j 2023 |e 10 |b 01 |c 10 |h 1187-1194 |