Refusal of Representation in Advance Care Planning : A Case-Inspired Ethical Analysis

© 2023 The Hastings Center..

Unrepresented patients-people without capacity to make medical decisions who also lack a surrogate decision-maker-form a large and vulnerable population within the United States health care system. The burden of unrepresentedness has rightly prompted widespread calls for more and better advance care planning, in which still-healthy patients are encouraged to designate a surrogate decision-maker and thus avoid the risk of becoming unrepresented. However, we observe that some patients, even with available social contacts and access to adequate advance care planning services, simply decline to name a surrogate decision-maker. We propose a novel concept of "informed refusal of representation" ("IRR") to characterize the position held by some such patients, who are often overlooked in prior work on unrepresentedness. We then discuss physicians' ethical obligations in the face of such a refusal and avenues by which physicians can support patients without surrogates in receiving goal-concordant care.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:53

Enthalten in:

The Hastings Center report - 53(2023), 2 vom: 03. März, Seite 3-8

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Peters, Andrew T [VerfasserIn]
Hauser, Joshua M [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Advance care planning
Clinical ethics
Journal Article
Shared decision-making
Surrogate decision-makers
Unrepresented patients
Veterans

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 25.04.2023

Date Revised 31.05.2023

published: Print

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1002/hast.1468

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM355963655