Impact of the treatment crossover design on comparative efficacy in EMPOWER-Lung 1 : Cemiplimab monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Copyright © 2023 Feliciano, McLoone, Xu, Quek, Kuznik, Pouliot, Gullo, Rietschel, Guyot, Konidaris, Chan, Keeping, Wilson and Freemantle..

Objectives: In randomized-controlled crossover design trials, overall survival (OS) treatment effect estimates are often confounded by the control group benefiting from treatment received post-progression. We estimated the adjusted OS treatment effect in EMPOWER-Lung 1 (NCT03088540) by accounting for the potential impact of crossover to cemiplimab among controls and continued cemiplimab treatment post-progression.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Patients with disease progression while on or after chemotherapy could receive cemiplimab 350 mg Q3W for ≤108 weeks. Those who experienced progression on cemiplimab could continue cemiplimab at 350 mg Q3W for ≤108 additional weeks with four chemotherapy cycles added. Three adjustment methods accounted for crossover and/or continued treatment: simplified two-stage correction (with or without recensoring), inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW), and rank-preserving structural failure time model (RPSFT; with or without recensoring).

Results: In the programmed cell death-ligand 1 ≥50% population (N=563; median 10.8-month follow-up), 38.2% (n=107/280) crossed over from chemotherapy to cemiplimab (71.3%, n=107/150, among those with confirmed progression) and 16.3% (n=46/283) received cemiplimab treatment after progression with the addition of histology-specific chemotherapy (38.7%, n=46/119, among those with confirmed progression). The unadjusted OS hazard ratio (HR) with cemiplimab versus chemotherapy was 0.566 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.418, 0.767). Simplified two-stage correction-the most suitable method based on published guidelines and trial characteristics-produced an OS HR of 0.490 (95% CI: 0.365, 0.654) without recensoring and 0.493 (95% CI: 0.361, 0.674) with recensoring. The IPCW and RPSFT methods produced estimates generally consistent with simplified two-stage correction.

Conclusions: After adjusting for treatment crossover and continued cemiplimab treatment after progression with the addition of histology-specific chemotherapy observed in EMPOWER-Lung 1, cemiplimab continued to demonstrate a clinically important and statistically significant OS benefit versus chemotherapy, consistent with the primary analysis.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12

Enthalten in:

Frontiers in oncology - 12(2022) vom: 13., Seite 1081729

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Feliciano, Josephine Louella [VerfasserIn]
McLoone, Dylan [VerfasserIn]
Xu, Yingxin [VerfasserIn]
Quek, Ruben G W [VerfasserIn]
Kuznik, Andreas [VerfasserIn]
Pouliot, Jean-Francois [VerfasserIn]
Gullo, Giuseppe [VerfasserIn]
Rietschel, Petra [VerfasserIn]
Guyot, Patricia [VerfasserIn]
Konidaris, Gerasimos [VerfasserIn]
Chan, Keith [VerfasserIn]
Keeping, Sam [VerfasserIn]
Wilson, Florence R [VerfasserIn]
Freemantle, Nick [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Cemiplimab
Chemotherapy
Crossover design
EMPOWER-lung 1
First-line treatment
Journal Article
Non-small cell lung cancer

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 22.04.2023

published: Electronic-eCollection

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.3389/fonc.2022.1081729

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM355858835