Comparative Effectiveness of Active Recovery and Static Stretching During Post-Exercise Recovery in Elite Youth Basketball
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of active recovery (AR) versus static stretching (SS) during post-exercise recovery in basketball. Methods: Using a counterbalanced crossover design, 17 elite youth male players completed two 90-min training sessions, followed by either AR or SS. Differences in jump height (CMJ), heart rate variability (Ln-rMSSD), muscle soreness (VAS), perceived recovery (TQR) and hormonal biomarkers (cortisol, testosterone, testosterone:cortisol ratio) between interventions were assessed at pre-session, post-session (except hormonal biomarkers), post-recovery and 24 h post-session. Differences in Ln-rMSSD were additionally assessed upon awakening on training day, and the following morning. Results: No significant differences were found between interventions at corresponding time points (p > .05). However, the within-intervention time course of recovery differed, as CMJ values were lower at post-recovery, compared with all other time points, in SS only (p < .05, effect size [ES] moderate-to-very large). Additionally, Ln-rMSSD values failed to return to baseline at post-recovery in AR only (p < .05, ES large-to-very large). Similarly, TQR scores were impaired at post-session and post-recovery in AR only (p < .05, ES moderate-to-large). No differences were reported for the remaining variables (p > .05). Conclusion: Differences between AR and SS were probably due to short-term phenomena, indicating that neither strategy was likely superior for improving recovery in the longer term. Overall, neither strategy seemed to significantly improve post-exercise recovery.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:95 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Research quarterly for exercise and sport - 95(2024), 1 vom: 28. März, Seite 272-280 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Pernigoni, Marco [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
3XMK78S47O |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.03.2024 Date Revised 12.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/02701367.2023.2195457 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM355442493 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM355442493 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240313233406.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/02701367.2023.2195457 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1326.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM355442493 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37039750 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pernigoni, Marco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative Effectiveness of Active Recovery and Static Stretching During Post-Exercise Recovery in Elite Youth Basketball |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 04.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 12.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of active recovery (AR) versus static stretching (SS) during post-exercise recovery in basketball. Methods: Using a counterbalanced crossover design, 17 elite youth male players completed two 90-min training sessions, followed by either AR or SS. Differences in jump height (CMJ), heart rate variability (Ln-rMSSD), muscle soreness (VAS), perceived recovery (TQR) and hormonal biomarkers (cortisol, testosterone, testosterone:cortisol ratio) between interventions were assessed at pre-session, post-session (except hormonal biomarkers), post-recovery and 24 h post-session. Differences in Ln-rMSSD were additionally assessed upon awakening on training day, and the following morning. Results: No significant differences were found between interventions at corresponding time points (p > .05). However, the within-intervention time course of recovery differed, as CMJ values were lower at post-recovery, compared with all other time points, in SS only (p < .05, effect size [ES] moderate-to-very large). Additionally, Ln-rMSSD values failed to return to baseline at post-recovery in AR only (p < .05, ES large-to-very large). Similarly, TQR scores were impaired at post-session and post-recovery in AR only (p < .05, ES moderate-to-large). No differences were reported for the remaining variables (p > .05). Conclusion: Differences between AR and SS were probably due to short-term phenomena, indicating that neither strategy was likely superior for improving recovery in the longer term. Overall, neither strategy seemed to significantly improve post-exercise recovery | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cool-down | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fatigue | |
| 650 | 4 | |a heart rate variability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a performance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a salivary biomarkers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a team sports | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Biomarkers |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hydrocortisone |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a WI4X0X7BPJ |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Testosterone |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 3XMK78S47O |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Calleja-González, Julio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lukonaitienė, Inga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tessitore, Antonio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stanislovaitienė, Jūratė |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kamarauskas, Paulius |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Conte, Daniele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Research quarterly for exercise and sport |d 1993 |g 95(2024), 1 vom: 28. März, Seite 272-280 |w (DE-627)NLM013284797 |x 2168-3824 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:95 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:03 |g pages:272-280 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2023.2195457 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 95 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 28 |c 03 |h 272-280 | ||