The Diffusion of Punitive Firearm Preemption Laws Across U.S. States
Copyright © 2023 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
INTRODUCTION: Firearm violence is a public health crisis. Most states prohibit local firearm laws, but some states have laws that allow for lawsuits and other penalties against local governments and lawmakers who pass firearm laws deemed preempted. These punitive firearm preemptive laws may reduce firearm policy innovation, discussion, and adoption beyond preemption alone. Yet, it is unknown how these laws spread from state to state.
METHODS: In 2022, using an event history analysis framework with state dyads, logistic regression models estimate the factors associated with adoption and diffusion of firearm punitive preemption laws, including state-level demographic, economic, legal, political, population, and state-neighbor factors.
RESULTS: As of 2021, 15 states had punitive firearm preemption laws. Higher numbers of background checks (AOR=1.50; 95% CI=1.15, 2.04), more conservative government ideology (AOR=7.79; 95% CI=2.05, 35.02), lower per capita income (AOR=0.16; 95% CI=0.05, 0.44), a higher number of permissive state firearm laws (AOR=2.75; 95% CI=1.57, 5.30), and neighboring state passage of the law (AOR=3.97; 95% CI=1.52, 11.51) were associated with law adoption.
CONCLUSIONS: Both internal and external state factors predict the adoption of punitive firearm preemption. This study may provide insight into which states are susceptible to adoption in the future. Advocates, especially in neighboring states without such laws, may want to focus their firearm safety policy efforts on opposing the passage of punitive firearm preemption.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:65 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
American journal of preventive medicine - 65(2023), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 649-656 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Macinko, James [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.09.2023 Date Revised 25.09.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.023 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM355332256 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM355332256 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226064125.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.023 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1184.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM355332256 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)37028569 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0749-3797(23)00163-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Macinko, James |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Diffusion of Punitive Firearm Preemption Laws Across U.S. States |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.09.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.09.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2023 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Firearm violence is a public health crisis. Most states prohibit local firearm laws, but some states have laws that allow for lawsuits and other penalties against local governments and lawmakers who pass firearm laws deemed preempted. These punitive firearm preemptive laws may reduce firearm policy innovation, discussion, and adoption beyond preemption alone. Yet, it is unknown how these laws spread from state to state | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: In 2022, using an event history analysis framework with state dyads, logistic regression models estimate the factors associated with adoption and diffusion of firearm punitive preemption laws, including state-level demographic, economic, legal, political, population, and state-neighbor factors | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: As of 2021, 15 states had punitive firearm preemption laws. Higher numbers of background checks (AOR=1.50; 95% CI=1.15, 2.04), more conservative government ideology (AOR=7.79; 95% CI=2.05, 35.02), lower per capita income (AOR=0.16; 95% CI=0.05, 0.44), a higher number of permissive state firearm laws (AOR=2.75; 95% CI=1.57, 5.30), and neighboring state passage of the law (AOR=3.97; 95% CI=1.52, 11.51) were associated with law adoption | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Both internal and external state factors predict the adoption of punitive firearm preemption. This study may provide insight into which states are susceptible to adoption in the future. Advocates, especially in neighboring states without such laws, may want to focus their firearm safety policy efforts on opposing the passage of punitive firearm preemption | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Silver, Diana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Clark, Duncan A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pomeranz, Jennifer L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of preventive medicine |d 1987 |g 65(2023), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 649-656 |w (DE-627)NLM01367370X |x 1873-2607 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:65 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g day:01 |g month:10 |g pages:649-656 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.023 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 65 |j 2023 |e 4 |b 01 |c 10 |h 649-656 | ||