Limiting Dynamic Driving Pressure in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved..
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies reported an association between higher driving pressure (∆P) and increased mortality for different groups of mechanically ventilated patients. However, it remained unclear if sustained intervention on ∆P, in addition to traditional lung-protective ventilation, improves outcomes. We investigated if ventilation strategies limiting daily static or dynamic ∆P reduce mortality compared with usual care in adult patients requiring greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation.
DESIGN: For this comparative effectiveness study, we emulated pragmatic clinical trials using data from the Toronto Intensive Care Observational Registry recorded between April 2014 and August 2021. The per-protocol effect of the interventions was estimated using the parametric g-formula, a method that controls for baseline and time-varying confounding, as well as for competing events in the analysis of longitudinal exposures.
SETTING: Nine ICUs from seven University of Toronto-affiliated hospitals.
PATIENTS: Adult patients (≥18 yr) requiring greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation.
INTERVENTIONS: Receipt of a ventilation strategy that limited either daily static or dynamic ∆P less than or equal to 15 cm H 2 O compared with usual care.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 12,865 eligible patients, 4,468 of (35%) were ventilated with dynamic ∆P greater than 15 cm H 2 O at baseline. Mortality under usual care was 20.1% (95% CI, 19.4-20.9%). Limiting daily dynamic ∆P less than or equal to 15 cm H 2 O in addition to traditional lung-protective ventilation reduced adherence-adjusted mortality to 18.1% (95% CI, 17.5-18.9%) (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.92). In further analyses, this effect was most pronounced for early and sustained interventions. Static ∆P at baseline were recorded in only 2,473 patients but similar effects were observed. Conversely, strict interventions on tidal volumes or peak inspiratory pressures, irrespective of ∆P, did not reduce mortality compared with usual care.
CONCLUSIONS: Limiting either static or dynamic ∆P can further reduce the mortality of patients requiring mechanical ventilation.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:51 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Critical care medicine - 51(2023), 7 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 861-871 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Urner, Martin [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.06.2023 Date Revised 06.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/CCM.0000000000005844 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM354764942 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM354764942 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240207232010.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005844 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1283.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM354764942 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36971437 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Urner, Martin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Limiting Dynamic Driving Pressure in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.06.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 06.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Previous studies reported an association between higher driving pressure (∆P) and increased mortality for different groups of mechanically ventilated patients. However, it remained unclear if sustained intervention on ∆P, in addition to traditional lung-protective ventilation, improves outcomes. We investigated if ventilation strategies limiting daily static or dynamic ∆P reduce mortality compared with usual care in adult patients requiring greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation | ||
520 | |a DESIGN: For this comparative effectiveness study, we emulated pragmatic clinical trials using data from the Toronto Intensive Care Observational Registry recorded between April 2014 and August 2021. The per-protocol effect of the interventions was estimated using the parametric g-formula, a method that controls for baseline and time-varying confounding, as well as for competing events in the analysis of longitudinal exposures | ||
520 | |a SETTING: Nine ICUs from seven University of Toronto-affiliated hospitals | ||
520 | |a PATIENTS: Adult patients (≥18 yr) requiring greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation | ||
520 | |a INTERVENTIONS: Receipt of a ventilation strategy that limited either daily static or dynamic ∆P less than or equal to 15 cm H 2 O compared with usual care | ||
520 | |a MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 12,865 eligible patients, 4,468 of (35%) were ventilated with dynamic ∆P greater than 15 cm H 2 O at baseline. Mortality under usual care was 20.1% (95% CI, 19.4-20.9%). Limiting daily dynamic ∆P less than or equal to 15 cm H 2 O in addition to traditional lung-protective ventilation reduced adherence-adjusted mortality to 18.1% (95% CI, 17.5-18.9%) (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.92). In further analyses, this effect was most pronounced for early and sustained interventions. Static ∆P at baseline were recorded in only 2,473 patients but similar effects were observed. Conversely, strict interventions on tidal volumes or peak inspiratory pressures, irrespective of ∆P, did not reduce mortality compared with usual care | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Limiting either static or dynamic ∆P can further reduce the mortality of patients requiring mechanical ventilation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Jüni, Peter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rojas-Saunero, L Paloma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hansen, Bettina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brochard, Laurent J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ferguson, Niall D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fan, Eddy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Critical care medicine |d 1973 |g 51(2023), 7 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 861-871 |w (DE-627)NLM000002631 |x 1530-0293 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2023 |g number:7 |g day:01 |g month:07 |g pages:861-871 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005844 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 51 |j 2023 |e 7 |b 01 |c 07 |h 861-871 |