Observations of Oncologists on Treatment Selection With Interim Positron Emission Tomography-Adapted Approaches in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma : The Real-World CONNECT Study
PURPOSE: We surveyed oncologists who treat classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) as part of the CONNECT study to understand the treatment decision-making process, including the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging.
METHODS: US physicians self-identifying as oncologists, hematologists, or hematologists/oncologists with ≥2 years of practice experience who treated ≥1 adult with stage III/IV cHL in the frontline setting in the last year were surveyed (October 19-November 16, 2020). Physician demographics, guideline adherence, and PET/CT utilization, interpretation, and access barriers were assessed.
RESULTS: In total, 301 physicians participated in the survey. Eighty-eight percent of physicians gave somewhat-to-significant consideration to NCCN guidelines. Most physicians (94%; n = 284) reported obtaining a PET/CT scan at diagnosis; of these physicians, 97% reported obtaining an interim PET/CT scan for stage III/IV cHL, with 65% typically obtaining an interim PET/CT scan after cycle 2. The Deauville 5-point scale (5PS) was the primary scoring system used to review PET/CT results by 62% of physicians, with a positive score defined as ≥3 by 44%, ≥4 by 37%, and ≥2 by 12% of physicians. Fifty-five percent of physicians reported difficulty in obtaining PET/CT scans.
CONCLUSION: Although most physicians considered NCCN guidelines when treating patients with stage III/IV cHL, interim PET/CT scans after cycle 2 were not universally obtained. When PET/CT scans were obtained, Deauville 5PS scores were not always provided, and variability existed on what defined a positive score. These findings suggest that opportunities exist for education and improved PET-adapted treatment approaches.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:19 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
JCO oncology practice - 19(2023), 6 vom: 11. Juni, Seite e867-e876 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Parsons, Susan K [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 21.06.2023 Date Revised 22.07.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1200/OP.22.00811 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM354529536 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM354529536 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226062424.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1200/OP.22.00811 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1181.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM354529536 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36947720 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Parsons, Susan K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Observations of Oncologists on Treatment Selection With Interim Positron Emission Tomography-Adapted Approaches in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma |b The Real-World CONNECT Study |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 21.06.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 22.07.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: We surveyed oncologists who treat classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) as part of the CONNECT study to understand the treatment decision-making process, including the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging | ||
520 | |a METHODS: US physicians self-identifying as oncologists, hematologists, or hematologists/oncologists with ≥2 years of practice experience who treated ≥1 adult with stage III/IV cHL in the frontline setting in the last year were surveyed (October 19-November 16, 2020). Physician demographics, guideline adherence, and PET/CT utilization, interpretation, and access barriers were assessed | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: In total, 301 physicians participated in the survey. Eighty-eight percent of physicians gave somewhat-to-significant consideration to NCCN guidelines. Most physicians (94%; n = 284) reported obtaining a PET/CT scan at diagnosis; of these physicians, 97% reported obtaining an interim PET/CT scan for stage III/IV cHL, with 65% typically obtaining an interim PET/CT scan after cycle 2. The Deauville 5-point scale (5PS) was the primary scoring system used to review PET/CT results by 62% of physicians, with a positive score defined as ≥3 by 44%, ≥4 by 37%, and ≥2 by 12% of physicians. Fifty-five percent of physicians reported difficulty in obtaining PET/CT scans | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Although most physicians considered NCCN guidelines when treating patients with stage III/IV cHL, interim PET/CT scans after cycle 2 were not universally obtained. When PET/CT scans were obtained, Deauville 5PS scores were not always provided, and variability existed on what defined a positive score. These findings suggest that opportunities exist for education and improved PET-adapted treatment approaches | ||
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Yu, Kristina S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Nicholas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kumar, Supriya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fanale, Michelle A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Holmes, Katie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Flores, Carlos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Surinach, Andy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Flora, Darcy R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Evens, Andrew M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t JCO oncology practice |d 2020 |g 19(2023), 6 vom: 11. Juni, Seite e867-e876 |w (DE-627)NLM301053103 |x 2688-1535 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2023 |g number:6 |g day:11 |g month:06 |g pages:e867-e876 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00811 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 19 |j 2023 |e 6 |b 11 |c 06 |h e867-e876 |