Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction : Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q
© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery..
BACKGROUND: Over the years, plastic surgery has acquired a central role in the integrated treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction using the prepectoral approach has emerged as an alternative to reconstruction using the subpectoral technique to overcome the complications arising from this type of surgery resulting as a consequence of muscle elevation. The satisfaction and quality of life of patients undergoing DTI breast reconstruction were evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire, comparing the prepectoral and the subpectoral technique.
METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional study on patients who underwent mastectomy and DTI breast reconstruction at our institution between 2013 and 2021 was conducted. Eighty-one patients were included and mainly divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure: 52 patients undergoing a subpectoral breast reconstruction approach and 29 patients receiving a prepectoral breast reconstruction. In order to assess the quality of life, the postoperative BREAST-Q module was administered electronically to the enrolled patients.
RESULTS: Higher scores in BREAST-Q domains were recorded from patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with prepectoral technique: psychosocial well-being (P<0.0085), sexual well-being (P<0.0120), physical well-being: lymphoedema (P<0.0001) and satisfaction with information received (P<0.0045). There were further statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to postoperative complications (p<0.0465) and the need for reoperation (p<0.0275).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction with prepectoral technique were more satisfied in terms of psychosocial, sexual and also physical well-being. These patients also had statistically lower complications and reoperations compared to patients who received breast reconstruction with the subpectoral technique.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors 38 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 39 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 40 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 41 Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1300-1302. - PMID 37261493 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:47 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Aesthetic plastic surgery - 47(2023), 4 vom: 21. Aug., Seite 1291-1299 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Cogliandro, Annalisa [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
BREAST-Q |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.08.2023 Date Revised 03.08.2023 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1300-1302. - PMID 37261493 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00266-023-03316-z |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM354501178 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM354501178 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226062347.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00266-023-03316-z |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1181.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM354501178 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36944866 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cogliandro, Annalisa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction |b Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 02.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 03.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1300-1302. - PMID 37261493 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Over the years, plastic surgery has acquired a central role in the integrated treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction using the prepectoral approach has emerged as an alternative to reconstruction using the subpectoral technique to overcome the complications arising from this type of surgery resulting as a consequence of muscle elevation. The satisfaction and quality of life of patients undergoing DTI breast reconstruction were evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire, comparing the prepectoral and the subpectoral technique | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional study on patients who underwent mastectomy and DTI breast reconstruction at our institution between 2013 and 2021 was conducted. Eighty-one patients were included and mainly divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure: 52 patients undergoing a subpectoral breast reconstruction approach and 29 patients receiving a prepectoral breast reconstruction. In order to assess the quality of life, the postoperative BREAST-Q module was administered electronically to the enrolled patients | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Higher scores in BREAST-Q domains were recorded from patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with prepectoral technique: psychosocial well-being (P<0.0085), sexual well-being (P<0.0120), physical well-being: lymphoedema (P<0.0001) and satisfaction with information received (P<0.0045). There were further statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to postoperative complications (p<0.0465) and the need for reoperation (p<0.0275) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction with prepectoral technique were more satisfied in terms of psychosocial, sexual and also physical well-being. These patients also had statistically lower complications and reoperations compared to patients who received breast reconstruction with the subpectoral technique | ||
520 | |a LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors 38 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 39 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 40 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 41 Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a BREAST-Q | |
650 | 4 | |a Breast reconstruction | |
650 | 4 | |a DTI | |
650 | 4 | |a Implant | |
650 | 4 | |a Mastectomy | |
650 | 4 | |a PROMs | |
650 | 4 | |a Plastic surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a Prepectoral | |
650 | 4 | |a Subpectoral | |
700 | 1 | |a Salzillo, Rosa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a De Bernardis, Riccardo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Loria, Francesco Saverio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Petrucci, Valeria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barone, Mauro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tenna, Stefania |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cagli, Barbara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Persichetti, Paolo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Aesthetic plastic surgery |d 1976 |g 47(2023), 4 vom: 21. Aug., Seite 1291-1299 |w (DE-627)NLM012961906 |x 1432-5241 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g day:21 |g month:08 |g pages:1291-1299 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03316-z |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 47 |j 2023 |e 4 |b 21 |c 08 |h 1291-1299 |