Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Among People Experiencing Homelessness : A Prospective Cohort and Implementation Study

© 2023. The Author(s)..

INTRODUCTION: Detection strategies in vulnerable populations such as people experiencing homelessness (PEH) need to be explored to promptly recognize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 Ag test in PEH during two pandemic waves compared with gold standard real-time multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR).

METHODS: All PEH ≥ 18 years requesting residence at the available shelters in Verona, Italy, across two cold-weather emergency periods (November 2020-May 2021 and December 2021-April 2022) were prospectively screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection by means of a naso-pharyingeal swab. A lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (Biocredit® COVID-19 Ag) was used as antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT). The rtRT-PCR was performed with Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 assay kit (Seegene). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated as measures for diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS: Overall, 503 participants were enrolled during the two intervention periods for a total of 732 paired swabs collected: 541 swabs in the first period and 191 in the second. No significant differences in demographic and infection-related characteristics were observed in tested subjects in the study periods, except for the rate of previous infection (0.8% versus 8%; p < 0.001) and vaccination (6% versus 73%; p < 0.001). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the cohort was 8% (58/732 swabs positive with rtRT-PCR). Seventeen swabs were collected from symptomatic patients (7%). Among them, the concordance between rtRT-PCR and Ag-RDT was 100%, 7 (41.2%) positive and 10 negative pairs. The overall sensitivity of Ag-RDT was 63.8% (95% CI 60.3-67.3) and specificity was 99.8% (95% CI 99.6-100). PPV and NPV were 97.5% and 96.8%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity did not change substantially across the two periods (65.1% and 99.8% in 2020-2021 vs. 60% and 100% in 2021-2022).

CONCLUSIONS: A periodic Ag-RDT-based screening approach for PEH at point of care could guide preventive measures, including prompt isolation, without referral to hospital-based laboratories for molecular test confirmation in case of positive detection even in individuals asymptomatic for COVID-19. This could help reduce the risk of outbreaks in shelter facilities.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12

Enthalten in:

Infectious diseases and therapy - 12(2023), 4 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 1073-1082

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

De Nardo, Pasquale [VerfasserIn]
Tebon, Maela [VerfasserIn]
Savoldi, Alessia [VerfasserIn]
Soriolo, Nicola [VerfasserIn]
Danese, Elisa [VerfasserIn]
Peserico, Denise [VerfasserIn]
Morra, Matteo [VerfasserIn]
Gentilotti, Elisa [VerfasserIn]
Caliskan, Gulser [VerfasserIn]
Marchetti, Pierpaolo [VerfasserIn]
Cecchetto, Riccardo [VerfasserIn]
Mazzariol, Annarita [VerfasserIn]
Verlato, Giuseppe [VerfasserIn]
Gibellini, Davide [VerfasserIn]
Tacconelli, Evelina [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

COVID-19 Ag rapid test
Diagnostic accuracy
Homeless
Journal Article
Vulnerable population

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 30.04.2023

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.1007/s40121-023-00787-0

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM35413566X