One-Year Post-Vaccination Longitudinal Follow-Up of Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Total Antibodies in Health Care Professionals and Evaluation of Correlation with Surrogate Neutralization Test
Numerous vaccines have been generated to decrease the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate the immunogenicity of the heterologous boosts by BioNTech against homologous boosts by CoronaVac at three-month intervals in two health care worker (HCW) cohorts, with or without prior COVID-19, for one year post-vaccination. This is a prospective cohort study in which the humoral responses of 386 HCWs were followed-up longitudinally in six main groups according to their previous COVID-19 exposure and vaccination status. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-RBD total antibody levels were measured and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization antibody (NAbs) responses against the ancestral Wuhan and the Omicron variant were evaluated comparatively using international standard serum for Wuhan and Omicron, as well as with the aid of a conversion tool. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-RBD total Ab and Nab difference between with and without prior COVID-19, three months after two-dose primary vaccination with CoronaVac, was statistically significant (p = 0.001). In the subsequent follow-ups, this difference was not observed between the groups. Those previously infected (PI) and non-previously infected (NPI) groups receiving BioNTech as the third dose had higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike total Ab levels (14.2-fold and 17.4-fold, respectively, p = 0.001) and Nab responses (against Wuhan and Omicron) than those receiving CoronaVac. Ab responses after booster vaccination decreased significantly in all groups at the ninth-month follow-up (p < 0.05); however, Abs were still higher in all booster received groups than that in the primary vaccination. Abs were above the protective level at the twelfth-month measurement in the entire of the second BioNTech received group as the fourth dose of vaccination. In the one-year follow-up period, the increased incidence of COVID-19 in the groups vaccinated with two or three doses of CoronaVac compared with the groups vaccinated with BioNTech as a booster suggested that continuing the heterologous CoronaVac/BioNTech vaccination, revised according to current SARS-CoV-2 variants and with at least a six-month interval booster would be an effective and safe strategy for protection against COVID-19, particularly in health care workers.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:11 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Vaccines - 11(2023), 2 vom: 03. Feb. |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Tuyji Tok, Yesim [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 01.03.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.3390/vaccines11020355 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM353573213 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM353573213 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226060320.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/vaccines11020355 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1178.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM353573213 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36851233 | ||
035 | |a (PII)355 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Tuyji Tok, Yesim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a One-Year Post-Vaccination Longitudinal Follow-Up of Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Total Antibodies in Health Care Professionals and Evaluation of Correlation with Surrogate Neutralization Test |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 01.03.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Numerous vaccines have been generated to decrease the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate the immunogenicity of the heterologous boosts by BioNTech against homologous boosts by CoronaVac at three-month intervals in two health care worker (HCW) cohorts, with or without prior COVID-19, for one year post-vaccination. This is a prospective cohort study in which the humoral responses of 386 HCWs were followed-up longitudinally in six main groups according to their previous COVID-19 exposure and vaccination status. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-RBD total antibody levels were measured and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization antibody (NAbs) responses against the ancestral Wuhan and the Omicron variant were evaluated comparatively using international standard serum for Wuhan and Omicron, as well as with the aid of a conversion tool. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-RBD total Ab and Nab difference between with and without prior COVID-19, three months after two-dose primary vaccination with CoronaVac, was statistically significant (p = 0.001). In the subsequent follow-ups, this difference was not observed between the groups. Those previously infected (PI) and non-previously infected (NPI) groups receiving BioNTech as the third dose had higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike total Ab levels (14.2-fold and 17.4-fold, respectively, p = 0.001) and Nab responses (against Wuhan and Omicron) than those receiving CoronaVac. Ab responses after booster vaccination decreased significantly in all groups at the ninth-month follow-up (p < 0.05); however, Abs were still higher in all booster received groups than that in the primary vaccination. Abs were above the protective level at the twelfth-month measurement in the entire of the second BioNTech received group as the fourth dose of vaccination. In the one-year follow-up period, the increased incidence of COVID-19 in the groups vaccinated with two or three doses of CoronaVac compared with the groups vaccinated with BioNTech as a booster suggested that continuing the heterologous CoronaVac/BioNTech vaccination, revised according to current SARS-CoV-2 variants and with at least a six-month interval booster would be an effective and safe strategy for protection against COVID-19, particularly in health care workers | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a heterologous | |
650 | 4 | |a inactivated | |
650 | 4 | |a mRNA | |
650 | 4 | |a vaccine | |
700 | 1 | |a Can Sarinoglu, Rabia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ordekci, Seyhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yilmaz, Serife |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ozcolpan, Gunes |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bayram, Aysen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nohut, Okan Kadir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kocer, Ipek |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hasdemir, Ufuk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kuskucu, Mert Ahmet |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Konukoglu, Dildar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gozalan, Aysegul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Midilli, Kenan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Celik, Gulden |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Vaccines |d 2012 |g 11(2023), 2 vom: 03. Feb. |w (DE-627)NLM239212347 |x 2076-393X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2023 |g number:2 |g day:03 |g month:02 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020355 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2023 |e 2 |b 03 |c 02 |