Concordance Between Initial Presumptive and Final Adjudicated Diagnoses of Infection Among Patients Meeting Sepsis-3 Criteria in the Emergency Department

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America..

BACKGROUND: Guidelines emphasize rapid antibiotic treatment for sepsis, but infection presence is often uncertain at initial presentation. We investigated the incidence and drivers of false-positive presumptive infection diagnosis among emergency department (ED) patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria.

METHODS: For a retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria (acute organ failure and suspected infection including blood cultures drawn and intravenous antimicrobials administered) in 1 of 4 EDs from 2013 to 2017, trained reviewers first identified the ED-diagnosed source of infection and adjudicated the presence and source of infection on final assessment. Reviewers subsequently adjudicated final infection probability for a randomly selected 10% subset of subjects. Risk factors for false-positive infection diagnosis and its association with 30-day mortality were evaluated using multivariable regression.

RESULTS: Of 8267 patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria in the ED, 699 (8.5%) did not have an infection on final adjudication and 1488 (18.0%) patients with confirmed infections had a different source of infection diagnosed in the ED versus final adjudication (ie, initial/final source diagnosis discordance). Among the subset of patients whose final infection probability was adjudicated (n = 812), 79 (9.7%) had only "possible" infection and 77 (9.5%) were not infected. Factors associated with false-positive infection diagnosis included hypothermia, altered mental status, comorbidity burden, and an "unknown infection source" diagnosis in the ED (odds ratio: 6.39; 95% confidence interval: 5.14-7.94). False-positive infection diagnosis was not associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: In this large multihospital study, <20% of ED patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria had no infection or only possible infection on retrospective adjudication.

Errataetall:

CommentIn: Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 16;76(12):2056-2058. - PMID 36804679

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:76

Enthalten in:

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America - 76(2023), 12 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 2047-2055

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Hooper, Gabriel A [VerfasserIn]
Klippel, Carolyn J [VerfasserIn]
McLean, Sierra R [VerfasserIn]
Stenehjem, Edward A [VerfasserIn]
Webb, Brandon J [VerfasserIn]
Murnin, Emily R [VerfasserIn]
Hough, Catherine L [VerfasserIn]
Bledsoe, Joseph R [VerfasserIn]
Brown, Samuel M [VerfasserIn]
Peltan, Ithan D [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Journal Article
Misdiagnosis
Overtreatment
Physician practice variation
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Sepsis
Source diagnosis discordance

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 19.06.2023

Date Revised 07.02.2024

published: Print

CommentIn: Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 16;76(12):2056-2058. - PMID 36804679

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1093/cid/ciad101

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM35312933X