The efficacy of implant surface decontamination using chemicals during surgical treatment of peri-implantitis : A systematic review and meta-analysis

© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd..

AIM: To answer the following PICOS question: "In adult patients with peri-implantitis, what is the efficacy of surgical therapy with chemical surface decontamination of implant surfaces in comparison with surgical therapy alone or surgery with placebo decontamination, on probing pocket depth (PD) reduction and bleeding on probing (BoP)/suppuration on probing (SoP), in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs with at least 6 months of follow-up?".

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six databases were searched from their inception up to 20 May 2022. Data on clinical outcome variables were pooled and analysed using mean differences (MDs), risk ratios (RRs), or risk differences (RDs) as appropriate, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and prediction intervals (PIs) in the case of significant heterogeneity. Primary outcomes were determined as changes in PD and BoP/SoP. Secondary outcomes were radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL), implant loss, and disease resolution. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022325603.

RESULTS: Six RCTs-two with moderate, three with high, and one with low risk of bias (RoB)-were included. These studies test the adjunctive effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), chlorhexidine (CHX), and administration of local antibiotics (LAbs) during surgery on the clinical outcome. In a single 12-month study, the adjunctive use of local antibiotics showed a clinically relevant reduction of PD [MD = 1.44; 95%CI (0.40 to -2.48)] and MBL [MD = 1.21; 95%CI (0.44-1.98); one trial, 32 participants]. PDT showed a small but significant reduction in BoP [MD = 7.41%; 95%CI (0.81-14.00); p = 0.028; two trials; 42 participants]. Treatment with CHX resulted in no significant changes in PD, BoP, or MBL compared to placebo (saline solution). None of the interventions affected disease resolution and implant loss. Certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcome measures assessed.

CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this systematic review and the meta-analysis, adjunctive use of chemicals such as PDT, CHX, and LAbs for surface decontamination during surgery of peri-implantitis cannot be recommended as superior to standard debridement procedures (mechanical debridement with or without saline).

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:50 Suppl 26

Enthalten in:

Journal of clinical periodontology - 50 Suppl 26(2023) vom: 20. Juni, Seite 336-358

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Wilensky, Asaf [VerfasserIn]
Shapira, Lior [VerfasserIn]
Limones, Alvaro [VerfasserIn]
Martin, Conchita [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Chlorhexidine
Dental Implants
Dental implants
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
R4KO0DY52L
Review
Systematic Review
Systematic review
Therapy

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 15.02.2024

Date Revised 15.02.2024

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1111/jcpe.13794

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM352986077