Breaking the Habit? Identifying Discrete Dimensions of Sitting Automaticity and Their Responsiveness to a Sitting-Reduction Intervention
© 2023. Crown..
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that sitting is activated automatically on exposure to associated environments, yet no study has yet sought to identify in what ways sitting may be automatic.
METHOD: This study used data from a 12-month sitting-reduction intervention trial to explore discrete dimensions of sitting automaticity, and how these dimensions may be affected by an intervention. One hundred ninety-four office workers reported sitting automaticity at baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after receiving one of two sitting-reduction intervention variants.
RESULTS: Principal component analysis extracted two automaticity components, corresponding to a lack of awareness and a lack of control. Scores on both automaticity scales decreased over time post-intervention, indicating that sitting became more mindful, though lack of awareness scores were consistently higher than lack of control scores.
CONCLUSION: Attempts to break office workers' sitting habits should seek to enhance conscious awareness of alternatives to sitting and afford office workers a greater sense of control over whether they sit or stand.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:31 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
International journal of behavioral medicine - 31(2024), 1 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 55-63 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Gardner, Benjamin [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Automaticity |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 24.01.2024 Date Revised 25.01.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s12529-023-10155-4 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM352604344 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM352604344 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240125231830.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12529-023-10155-4 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1270.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM352604344 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36750501 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gardner, Benjamin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Breaking the Habit? Identifying Discrete Dimensions of Sitting Automaticity and Their Responsiveness to a Sitting-Reduction Intervention |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 24.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 25.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2023. Crown. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that sitting is activated automatically on exposure to associated environments, yet no study has yet sought to identify in what ways sitting may be automatic | ||
520 | |a METHOD: This study used data from a 12-month sitting-reduction intervention trial to explore discrete dimensions of sitting automaticity, and how these dimensions may be affected by an intervention. One hundred ninety-four office workers reported sitting automaticity at baseline, and 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after receiving one of two sitting-reduction intervention variants | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Principal component analysis extracted two automaticity components, corresponding to a lack of awareness and a lack of control. Scores on both automaticity scales decreased over time post-intervention, indicating that sitting became more mindful, though lack of awareness scores were consistently higher than lack of control scores | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Attempts to break office workers' sitting habits should seek to enhance conscious awareness of alternatives to sitting and afford office workers a greater sense of control over whether they sit or stand | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Automaticity | |
650 | 4 | |a Behaviour | |
650 | 4 | |a Habit | |
650 | 4 | |a Health psychology | |
650 | 4 | |a Sedentary behaviour | |
650 | 4 | |a Sitting | |
700 | 1 | |a Mainsbridge, Casey P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rebar, Amanda L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cooley, P Dean |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Honan, Cynthia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a O'Brien, Jane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pedersen, Scott J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of behavioral medicine |d 1994 |g 31(2024), 1 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 55-63 |w (DE-627)NLM093647417 |x 1532-7558 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:18 |g month:01 |g pages:55-63 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10155-4 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 31 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 18 |c 01 |h 55-63 |