Treatment Tolerability and Toxicity of Postoperative Proton Beam Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies : Results of the Prospective Phase 2 APROVE Trial
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
PURPOSE: The APROVE study is a prospective one-arm phase-2 study investigating the safety and treatment tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with uterine cervical or endometrial cancer. In this analysis, we report the primary study endpoint of safety and treatment tolerability as well as toxicity rates and progression-free survival (PFS).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: 25 patients were treated with postoperative proton beam therapy with a total dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 5 to 6 × 1.8 Gy (RBE) fractions weekly using active raster-scanning intensity modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Sequential or simultaneous platinum-based chemotherapy was administered if indicated. The primary endpoint was defined as the lack of any acute ≥grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital (GU) toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 or premature treatment abortion. Secondary endpoints were clinical symptoms and toxicity, quality of life, and PFS.
RESULTS: All patients completed IMPT according to the protocol, with a median treatment duration of 43 days (range, 33 to 51 days). No patient developed gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity ≥grade 3, and the treatment tolerability rate was 100%. Therefore, the null hypothesis H0: Tolerability Rate ≤80% could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis H1: Tolerability rate >80% using an exact binomial test with a one-sided significance level of α = 10% (one-sided P value P = .0059). The median follow-up time after the end of IMPT was 25.1 months (range, 20.2 to 50.3 months). 18 of 25 (75%) patients completed the study follow-up of 24 months. 7 patients had progressive disease. Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean PFS was 39.9 months (95% confidence interval: 33.37 to 46.5 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative IMPT is a safe treatment option for cervical and endometrial cancer patients, with only low-grade acute and late toxicities. Larger randomized trials are necessary to further assess the potential of IMPT and improve patient selection.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:116 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics - 116(2023), 4 vom: 15. Juli, Seite 825-836 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Arians, Nathalie [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.06.2023 Date Revised 16.11.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.004 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM351530177 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM351530177 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226051605.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.004 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1171.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM351530177 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36642110 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0360-3016(23)00012-3 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Arians, Nathalie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Treatment Tolerability and Toxicity of Postoperative Proton Beam Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies |b Results of the Prospective Phase 2 APROVE Trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.06.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 16.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: The APROVE study is a prospective one-arm phase-2 study investigating the safety and treatment tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with uterine cervical or endometrial cancer. In this analysis, we report the primary study endpoint of safety and treatment tolerability as well as toxicity rates and progression-free survival (PFS) | ||
520 | |a METHODS AND MATERIALS: 25 patients were treated with postoperative proton beam therapy with a total dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 5 to 6 × 1.8 Gy (RBE) fractions weekly using active raster-scanning intensity modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Sequential or simultaneous platinum-based chemotherapy was administered if indicated. The primary endpoint was defined as the lack of any acute ≥grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital (GU) toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 or premature treatment abortion. Secondary endpoints were clinical symptoms and toxicity, quality of life, and PFS | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: All patients completed IMPT according to the protocol, with a median treatment duration of 43 days (range, 33 to 51 days). No patient developed gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity ≥grade 3, and the treatment tolerability rate was 100%. Therefore, the null hypothesis H0: Tolerability Rate ≤80% could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis H1: Tolerability rate >80% using an exact binomial test with a one-sided significance level of α = 10% (one-sided P value P = .0059). The median follow-up time after the end of IMPT was 25.1 months (range, 20.2 to 50.3 months). 18 of 25 (75%) patients completed the study follow-up of 24 months. 7 patients had progressive disease. Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean PFS was 39.9 months (95% confidence interval: 33.37 to 46.5 months) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative IMPT is a safe treatment option for cervical and endometrial cancer patients, with only low-grade acute and late toxicities. Larger randomized trials are necessary to further assess the potential of IMPT and improve patient selection | ||
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Trial, Phase II | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Lindel, Katja |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Krisam, Johannes |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Oelmann-Avendano, Jan Tobias |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Meixner, Eva |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a König, Laila |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wark, Antje |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Forster, Tobias |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Weykamp, Fabian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lang, Kristin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Schneeweiss, Andreas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ellerbrock, Malte |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mielke, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Herfarth, Klaus |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Debus, Juergen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |d 1983 |g 116(2023), 4 vom: 15. Juli, Seite 825-836 |w (DE-627)NLM000375381 |x 1879-355X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:116 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g day:15 |g month:07 |g pages:825-836 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.004 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 116 |j 2023 |e 4 |b 15 |c 07 |h 825-836 |