Emulating a Target Trial of Dynamic Treatment Strategies for Major Depressive Disorder Using Data From the STAR∗D Randomized Trial

Copyright © 2022 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend adding a second drug for patients with major depressive disorder who have a partial response and switching antidepressants for those who show no response or intolerance. This guidelines-based strategy was compared with other strategies for the management of unresponsive depression.

METHODS: A total of 1436 individuals experiencing treatment failure with citalopram and still requiring antidepressant therapy were identified in the STAR∗D (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression) trial. A (hypothetical) target trial was then designed and emulated. The following strategies for decision making were compared: sequential monotherapy, sequential dual non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy (SD), and a guidelines-based strategy. The primary outcome was symptomatic remission defined as a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≤7 or 2 consecutive scores ≤5 on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated. Secondary outcomes were serious events (hospitalizations, suicide, and mortality). Inverse probability weighting was used to control for possible confounding.

RESULTS: A total of 971 patients were eligible for our emulation. Patients initiating SD had the lowest levels of depression at baseline. The estimated 9-month probability of remission was 43.5% for the sequential monotherapy group, 47.6% for the SD group, and 53.2% for the guidelines-based strategy group. Compared with the sequential monotherapy group, the difference in 9-month probability of remission was -4.2% (95% CI, -15.6 to 4.6) for the SD group and -9.7% (-19.3 to 1.9) for the guidelines-based strategy group. The 9-month relative risks of remission were 1.09 (0.90 to 1.38) and 1.22 (0.96 to 1.46), respectively. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. The 9-month relative risks of serious events were 0.77 (0.38 to 1.40) and 0.62 (0.33 to 1.00), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Using the guidelines-based strategy was associated with an increased probability of remission and a lower risk of serious adverse events. The potential implications are substantial given the large number of patients experiencing treatment failure to antidepressants.

Errataetall:

CommentIn: Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 15;93(12):1059-1060. - PMID 37257983

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:93

Enthalten in:

Biological psychiatry - 93(2023), 12 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 1127-1136

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Szmulewicz, Alejandro G [VerfasserIn]
Wanis, Kerollos N [VerfasserIn]
Perlis, Roy H [VerfasserIn]
Hernández-Díaz, Sonia [VerfasserIn]
Öngür, Dost [VerfasserIn]
Hernán, Miguel A [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

0DHU5B8D6V
Antidepressant-resistant depression
Antidepressants
Antidepressive Agents
Citalopram
Epidemiology
Journal Article
Major depressive disorder
Methodology
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 02.06.2023

Date Revised 09.06.2023

published: Print-Electronic

CommentIn: Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 15;93(12):1059-1060. - PMID 37257983

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.09.028

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM351502335