The SUMMIT Study : Utilising a written 'Next Steps' information booklet to prepare participants for potential lung cancer screening results and follow-up
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVES: Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer can result in several potential outcomes of varying significance. Communication methods used in Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programmes must, therefore, ensure that participants are prepared for the range of possible results and follow-up. Here, we assess perceptions of a written preparatory information booklet provided to participants in a large LCS cohort designed to convey this information.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All participants in the SUMMIT Study (NCT03934866) were provided with a results preparation information booklet, entitled 'The SUMMIT Study: Next Steps' at their baseline appointment which outlined potential results, their significance, and timelines for follow up. Results from the LDCT scan and Lung Health Check were subsequently sent by letter. Perceptions of this booklet were assessed among participants with indeterminate pulmonary findings when they attended a face-to-face appointment immediately before their three-month interval scan. Specifically, questions assessed the perceived usefulness of the booklet and the amount of information contained in it.
RESULTS: 70.1% (n = 1,412/2,014) participants remembered receiving the booklet at their appointment. Of these participants, 72.0% (n = 1,017/1,412) found it quite or very useful and 68.0% (n = 960/1,412) reported that it contained the right amount of information. Older participants, those from the least deprived socioeconomic quintile and those of Black ethnicity were less likely to report finding the booklet either quite or very useful, or that it contained the right amount of information. Participants who remembered receiving the booklet were more likely to be satisfied with the process of results communication by letter.
CONCLUSION: Providing written information that prepares participants for possible LDCT results and their significance appears to be a useful resource and a helpful adjunct to a written method of results communication for large scale LCS programmes.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:176 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) - 176(2023) vom: 02. Feb., Seite 75-81 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Bhamani, Amyn [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Clinical Study |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.02.2023 Date Revised 20.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03934866 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.12.006 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM351321209 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM351321209 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240320232928.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.12.006 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1337.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM351321209 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36621036 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0169-5002(22)00715-2 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bhamani, Amyn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The SUMMIT Study |b Utilising a written 'Next Steps' information booklet to prepare participants for potential lung cancer screening results and follow-up |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 08.02.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 20.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03934866 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer can result in several potential outcomes of varying significance. Communication methods used in Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programmes must, therefore, ensure that participants are prepared for the range of possible results and follow-up. Here, we assess perceptions of a written preparatory information booklet provided to participants in a large LCS cohort designed to convey this information | ||
520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: All participants in the SUMMIT Study (NCT03934866) were provided with a results preparation information booklet, entitled 'The SUMMIT Study: Next Steps' at their baseline appointment which outlined potential results, their significance, and timelines for follow up. Results from the LDCT scan and Lung Health Check were subsequently sent by letter. Perceptions of this booklet were assessed among participants with indeterminate pulmonary findings when they attended a face-to-face appointment immediately before their three-month interval scan. Specifically, questions assessed the perceived usefulness of the booklet and the amount of information contained in it | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: 70.1% (n = 1,412/2,014) participants remembered receiving the booklet at their appointment. Of these participants, 72.0% (n = 1,017/1,412) found it quite or very useful and 68.0% (n = 960/1,412) reported that it contained the right amount of information. Older participants, those from the least deprived socioeconomic quintile and those of Black ethnicity were less likely to report finding the booklet either quite or very useful, or that it contained the right amount of information. Participants who remembered receiving the booklet were more likely to be satisfied with the process of results communication by letter | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Providing written information that prepares participants for possible LDCT results and their significance appears to be a useful resource and a helpful adjunct to a written method of results communication for large scale LCS programmes | ||
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a LDCT | |
650 | 4 | |a Lung Cancer Screening | |
650 | 4 | |a Pulmonary Nodule | |
650 | 4 | |a Result Communication | |
700 | 1 | |a Horst, Carolyn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bojang, Fanta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Quaife, Samantha L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dickson, Jennifer L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tisi, Sophie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hall, Helen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Verghese, Priyam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Creamer, Andrew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Prendecki, Ruth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McCabe, John |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gyertson, Kylie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bowyer, Vicky |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a El-Emir, Ethaar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cotton, Alice |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mehta, Simranjit |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Levermore, Claire |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mullin, Anne-Marie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Teague, Jonathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Farrelly, Laura |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nair, Arjun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Devaraj, Anand |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hackshaw, Allan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a SUMMIT consortium |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Janes, Sam M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) |d 1994 |g 176(2023) vom: 02. Feb., Seite 75-81 |w (DE-627)NLM074973657 |x 1872-8332 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:176 |g year:2023 |g day:02 |g month:02 |g pages:75-81 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.12.006 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 176 |j 2023 |b 02 |c 02 |h 75-81 |