Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study) : a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ..
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the usefulness of using automated appointment check-in screens to collect brief research data from patients, prior to their general practice consultation.
DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Nine general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Recruitment commenced in Autumn 2018 and was concluded by 31 March 2019.
PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 18 years and above, self-completing an automated check-in screen prior to their general practice consultation, were invited to participate during a 3-week recruitment period.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The response rate to the use of the automated check-in screen as a research data collection tool was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included responses to the two research questions and an assessment of impact of check-in completion on general practice operationalisation RESULTS: Over 85% (n=9274) of patients self-completing an automated check-in screen participated in the Automated Check-in Data Collection Study (61.0% (n=5653) women, mean age 55.1 years (range 18-98 years, SD=18.5)). 96.2% (n=8922) of participants answered a 'clinical' research question, reporting the degree of bodily pain experienced during the past 4 weeks: 32.9% (n=2937) experienced no pain, 28.1% (n=2507) very mild or mild pain and 39.0% (n=3478) moderate, severe or very severe pain. 89.3% (n=8285) of participants answered a 'non-clinical' research question on contact regarding future research studies: 46.9% (n=3889) of participants responded 'Yes, I'd be happy for you to contact me about research of relevance to me'.
CONCLUSIONS: Using automated check-in facilities to integrate research into routine general practice is a potentially useful way to collect brief research data from patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic initiating an extensive digital transformation in society, now is an ideal time to build on these opportunities and investigate alternative, innovative ways to collect research data.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82531292.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
BMJ open - 13(2023), 1 vom: 05. Jan., Seite e062389 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Lawton, Sarah [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Health informatics |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 09.01.2023 Date Revised 31.01.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062389 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM351152784 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM351152784 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226205809.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062389 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1170.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM351152784 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36604124 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lawton, Sarah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study) |b a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 09.01.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 31.01.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: To investigate the usefulness of using automated appointment check-in screens to collect brief research data from patients, prior to their general practice consultation | ||
520 | |a DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study | ||
520 | |a SETTING: Nine general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Recruitment commenced in Autumn 2018 and was concluded by 31 March 2019 | ||
520 | |a PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 18 years and above, self-completing an automated check-in screen prior to their general practice consultation, were invited to participate during a 3-week recruitment period | ||
520 | |a PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The response rate to the use of the automated check-in screen as a research data collection tool was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included responses to the two research questions and an assessment of impact of check-in completion on general practice operationalisation RESULTS: Over 85% (n=9274) of patients self-completing an automated check-in screen participated in the Automated Check-in Data Collection Study (61.0% (n=5653) women, mean age 55.1 years (range 18-98 years, SD=18.5)). 96.2% (n=8922) of participants answered a 'clinical' research question, reporting the degree of bodily pain experienced during the past 4 weeks: 32.9% (n=2937) experienced no pain, 28.1% (n=2507) very mild or mild pain and 39.0% (n=3478) moderate, severe or very severe pain. 89.3% (n=8285) of participants answered a 'non-clinical' research question on contact regarding future research studies: 46.9% (n=3889) of participants responded 'Yes, I'd be happy for you to contact me about research of relevance to me' | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Using automated check-in facilities to integrate research into routine general practice is a potentially useful way to collect brief research data from patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic initiating an extensive digital transformation in society, now is an ideal time to build on these opportunities and investigate alternative, innovative ways to collect research data | ||
520 | |a TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82531292 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Health informatics | |
650 | 4 | |a PRIMARY CARE | |
650 | 4 | |a PUBLIC HEALTH | |
700 | 1 | |a Mallen, Christian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Muller, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wathall, Simon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Helliwell, Toby |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMJ open |d 2012 |g 13(2023), 1 vom: 05. Jan., Seite e062389 |w (DE-627)NLM215724372 |x 2044-6055 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:05 |g month:01 |g pages:e062389 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062389 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 05 |c 01 |h e062389 |