A Qualitative Perspective on the Status of the Master's Thesis in Higher education - A Commentary on 'Social Normativity of Research Methods and the Methodological Discrepancy Between Mainstream Psychological Research and Danish Psychology Students' Master's Thesis Projects'
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature..
In this paper, the findings and conclusions from a previous study concerning Danish psychology students' Master thesis projects are discussed. By conducting eight qualitative semi-structured interviews with nine psychology students, shortly after they had handed in their Master's theses, we attempted to uncover and challenge some of our previous findings. We set out to deepen our previous conclusions concerning (1) why there is a seeming discrepancy between the use of certain methods and theories amongst the students and psychology as a discipline writ large, (2) whether their use of qualitative methods indicated a routine-like relationship to methods, and (3) whether a unification of methods and theories can be identified. Based on the interviews conducted for this commentary, we conclude that the students do indeed take an active stance when it comes to choosing their methods and topics, and that they are fully aware of the discrepancy between their interests and psychology as a discipline.
Errataetall: |
CommentOn: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Dec;56(4):863-878. - PMID 34085192 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:57 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Integrative psychological & behavioral science - 57(2023), 3 vom: 25. Sept., Seite 1050-1064 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Szulevicz, Thomas [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Comment |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.07.2023 Date Revised 26.09.2023 published: Print-Electronic CommentOn: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Dec;56(4):863-878. - PMID 34085192 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s12124-022-09743-y |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM350789053 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM350789053 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226045807.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12124-022-09743-y |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1169.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM350789053 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36567413 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Szulevicz, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Qualitative Perspective on the Status of the Master's Thesis in Higher education - A Commentary on 'Social Normativity of Research Methods and the Methodological Discrepancy Between Mainstream Psychological Research and Danish Psychology Students' Master's Thesis Projects' |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 18.07.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 26.09.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a CommentOn: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Dec;56(4):863-878. - PMID 34085192 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. | ||
520 | |a In this paper, the findings and conclusions from a previous study concerning Danish psychology students' Master thesis projects are discussed. By conducting eight qualitative semi-structured interviews with nine psychology students, shortly after they had handed in their Master's theses, we attempted to uncover and challenge some of our previous findings. We set out to deepen our previous conclusions concerning (1) why there is a seeming discrepancy between the use of certain methods and theories amongst the students and psychology as a discipline writ large, (2) whether their use of qualitative methods indicated a routine-like relationship to methods, and (3) whether a unification of methods and theories can be identified. Based on the interviews conducted for this commentary, we conclude that the students do indeed take an active stance when it comes to choosing their methods and topics, and that they are fully aware of the discrepancy between their interests and psychology as a discipline | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Comment | |
650 | 4 | |a Dissertation | |
650 | 4 | |a Higher education | |
650 | 4 | |a Methodology | |
650 | 4 | |a Neoliberalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of science | |
650 | 4 | |a Thesis | |
700 | 1 | |a Clement Lund, Peter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Integrative psychological & behavioral science |d 2007 |g 57(2023), 3 vom: 25. Sept., Seite 1050-1064 |w (DE-627)NLM174921721 |x 1936-3567 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g day:25 |g month:09 |g pages:1050-1064 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09743-y |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 57 |j 2023 |e 3 |b 25 |c 09 |h 1050-1064 |