The next generation of researchers : One-year outcome data from the SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program
© 2022 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine..
Introduction: As the field of medical education evolves, there is a need to increase the quality of education scholarship and develop a cadre of research scholars; however, clinician educators (CEs) considering this career transition have limited formal training in education research methodology to heed this call. Therefore, a program that provides more advanced training in education scholarship for CEs without the financial and resource barriers of fellowships and masters programs is needed.
Methods: The SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program is a longitudinal program for the beyond-beginner CE, seeking advanced training in education research. The program was created using a comprehensive needs assessment and included longitudinal training; small-group projects; dedicated project mentors; and integrated diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Program participants applied for a grant upon program completion.
Results: Twenty-one participants completed the course with 100% completing the baseline survey and 67% (14/21) completing the end-of-program survey. Participants reported improved perception of knowledge across all of the topics with a medium to large effect size, ranging from 0.40 to 0.62. When asked about impact on their network of potential collaborators, participants reported a median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-8) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their community of practice, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 5-7) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their professional identity, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 4-9) out of 9. Participants also reported an increase in both the quantity (mean of 2 ± 1 new mentors) and the quality (median score 7 [IQR 5-8] out of 9) of new research mentorship as a result of the program. Open-ended feedback was generally positive, with 100% reporting they would advise others to take this program.
Conclusions: The SAEM ARMED MedEd program represents a proof of concept for an advanced education research program seeking to fill the research training gap for the beyond-beginner Clinician educators.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:6 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
AEM education and training - 6(2022), 6 vom: 10. Dez., Seite e10818 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Gottlieb, Michael [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 22.11.2023 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/aet2.10818 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM350735484 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM350735484 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226045651.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/aet2.10818 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1169.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM350735484 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36562028 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gottlieb, Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The next generation of researchers |b One-year outcome data from the SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 22.11.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. | ||
520 | |a Introduction: As the field of medical education evolves, there is a need to increase the quality of education scholarship and develop a cadre of research scholars; however, clinician educators (CEs) considering this career transition have limited formal training in education research methodology to heed this call. Therefore, a program that provides more advanced training in education scholarship for CEs without the financial and resource barriers of fellowships and masters programs is needed | ||
520 | |a Methods: The SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program is a longitudinal program for the beyond-beginner CE, seeking advanced training in education research. The program was created using a comprehensive needs assessment and included longitudinal training; small-group projects; dedicated project mentors; and integrated diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Program participants applied for a grant upon program completion | ||
520 | |a Results: Twenty-one participants completed the course with 100% completing the baseline survey and 67% (14/21) completing the end-of-program survey. Participants reported improved perception of knowledge across all of the topics with a medium to large effect size, ranging from 0.40 to 0.62. When asked about impact on their network of potential collaborators, participants reported a median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-8) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their community of practice, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 5-7) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their professional identity, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 4-9) out of 9. Participants also reported an increase in both the quantity (mean of 2 ± 1 new mentors) and the quality (median score 7 [IQR 5-8] out of 9) of new research mentorship as a result of the program. Open-ended feedback was generally positive, with 100% reporting they would advise others to take this program | ||
520 | |a Conclusions: The SAEM ARMED MedEd program represents a proof of concept for an advanced education research program seeking to fill the research training gap for the beyond-beginner Clinician educators | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Chan, Teresa M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sebok-Syer, Stefanie S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Krzyzaniak, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dubosh, Nicole M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Santen, Sally |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Caretta-Weyer, Holly |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yarris, Lalena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Coates, Wendy C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Emergency Medicine Health Professions Education Research Consortium (EMPERC) |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t AEM education and training |d 2017 |g 6(2022), 6 vom: 10. Dez., Seite e10818 |w (DE-627)NLM286910349 |x 2472-5390 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g day:10 |g month:12 |g pages:e10818 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10818 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 6 |j 2022 |e 6 |b 10 |c 12 |h e10818 |