Single beta-blocker or combined amiodarone therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator patients : Insights from the German DEVICE registry

Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..

BACKGROUND: Because of its antiarrhythmic potency and due to the lack of alternatives, amiodarone is often used for antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator systems. To date, robust data on the safety and clinical benefit of amiodarone therapy in these patients are missing.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the periprocedural and postprocedural outcomes of combined therapy with beta-blockers plus amiodarone compared to treatment with single beta-blockers in the "real-life" cohort of ICD recipients of the German DEVICE registry.

METHODS: A total of 4499 patients who underwent ICD implantation, revision, or upgrade in 49 centers participating in the German DEVICE registry were enrolled from March 2007 to February 2014.

RESULTS: Amiodarone had no significant effect on the success of defibrillation testing. Early implantation-associated complications were similar between the groups. However, 1-year overall mortality was significantly higher in the beta-blocker plus amiodarone cohort (adjusted hazard ratio 2.09; P <.001). Interestingly, among the surviving patients, amiodarone was not associated with a significantly reduced risk of ICD discharges or syncopal events. Furthermore, the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm or incessant VTs and the number of patients scheduled for intracardiac ablation did not differ among both groups, whereas the rate of rehospitalization was lower in the cohort with only beta-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS: Although amiodarone has no adverse effect on the success of defibrillation testing, our data suggest an increased all-cause mortality under amiodarone therapy, especially in the subgroups of patients with sinus rhythm or severely reduced left ventricular function. In surviving patients, rates of arrhythmic events were comparable.

Errataetall:

CommentIn: Heart Rhythm. 2023 Apr;20(4):510-511. - PMID 36634902

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:20

Enthalten in:

Heart rhythm - 20(2023), 4 vom: 20. Apr., Seite 501-509

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Wiedmann, Felix [VerfasserIn]
Ince, Hüseyin [VerfasserIn]
Stellbrink, Christoph [VerfasserIn]
Kleemann, Thomas [VerfasserIn]
Eckardt, Lars [VerfasserIn]
Brachmann, Johannes [VerfasserIn]
Gonska, Bernd-Dieter [VerfasserIn]
Kääb, Stefan [VerfasserIn]
Perings, Christian A [VerfasserIn]
Jung, Werner [VerfasserIn]
Lugenbiel, Patrick [VerfasserIn]
Hochadel, Matthias [VerfasserIn]
Senges, Jochen [VerfasserIn]
Frey, Norbert [VerfasserIn]
Schmidt, Constanze [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Amiodarone
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Antiarrhythmic drugs
Beta-blocker
Cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Journal Article
N3RQ532IUT
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 03.04.2023

Date Revised 27.04.2023

published: Print-Electronic

CommentIn: Heart Rhythm. 2023 Apr;20(4):510-511. - PMID 36634902

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.12.009

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM350214395