Should moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting? a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with increased risks of mortality and heart failure. However, the optimal management of moderate IMR remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to appraise whether moderate IMR should be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from its inception up to 15 October 2022 for studies that assessed CABG alone versus CABG with mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with moderate IMR. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality.
RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with propensity-matched data including 1209 patients assessing CABG alone (n = 598) versus CABG with MV surgery (n = 611) were included. Compared to CABG alone, the addition of MV surgery did not significantly increase perioperative mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.52-1.96; p = 0.98) and stroke (RR, 2.14; 95% CI, 0.97-4.72; p = 0.06), whereas a longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration (MD, 54.91; 95% CI, 42.13-67.68; p < 0.01) and an increased incidence of renal failure were observed in the combined-procedure group. At follow-up, the addition of MV surgery was significantly associated with reduced rates of residual MR (RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.51; p < 0.01) and NYHA class III-IV (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78; p < 0.01). However, there was no difference in either mid-term mortality (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-1.70; p = 0.82) or late mortality (RR, 91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.71; p = 0.78) between the CABG alone group and the combined-procedure group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate IMR, the addition of MV surgery to CABG did not increase perioperative mortality. Despite the reduced rates of moderate MR and NYHA class III-IV at follow-up, the addition of MV surgery did not translate in a reduction in mid-term or late mortality.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:39 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Perfusion - 39(2024), 2 vom: 05. Feb., Seite 373-381 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Wu, Haibo [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Coronary artery bypass grafting |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.02.2024 Date Revised 28.02.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1177/02676591221144558 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM349930252 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM349930252 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240229170002.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/02676591221144558 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1310.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM349930252 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36480690 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wu, Haibo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Should moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 28.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.02.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with increased risks of mortality and heart failure. However, the optimal management of moderate IMR remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to appraise whether moderate IMR should be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from its inception up to 15 October 2022 for studies that assessed CABG alone versus CABG with mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with moderate IMR. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with propensity-matched data including 1209 patients assessing CABG alone (n = 598) versus CABG with MV surgery (n = 611) were included. Compared to CABG alone, the addition of MV surgery did not significantly increase perioperative mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.52-1.96; p = 0.98) and stroke (RR, 2.14; 95% CI, 0.97-4.72; p = 0.06), whereas a longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration (MD, 54.91; 95% CI, 42.13-67.68; p < 0.01) and an increased incidence of renal failure were observed in the combined-procedure group. At follow-up, the addition of MV surgery was significantly associated with reduced rates of residual MR (RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.51; p < 0.01) and NYHA class III-IV (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78; p < 0.01). However, there was no difference in either mid-term mortality (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-1.70; p = 0.82) or late mortality (RR, 91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.71; p = 0.78) between the CABG alone group and the combined-procedure group | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate IMR, the addition of MV surgery to CABG did not increase perioperative mortality. Despite the reduced rates of moderate MR and NYHA class III-IV at follow-up, the addition of MV surgery did not translate in a reduction in mid-term or late mortality | ||
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a coronary artery bypass grafting | |
650 | 4 | |a ischemic mitral regurgitation | |
650 | 4 | |a meta-analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a mitral valve repair | |
650 | 4 | |a mitral valve replacement | |
650 | 4 | |a mortality | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Wei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Perfusion |d 1990 |g 39(2024), 2 vom: 05. Feb., Seite 373-381 |w (DE-627)NLM074653768 |x 1477-111X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g day:05 |g month:02 |g pages:373-381 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02676591221144558 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 39 |j 2024 |e 2 |b 05 |c 02 |h 373-381 |