The double-edged sword of abortion regulations : Decreasing training opportunities while increasing knowledge requirements
PURPOSE: The authors explore how abortion regulations in Ohio, an abortion-restrictive state in the USA, impact obstetrician-gynecologists' (OB/GYNs) training in reproductive healthcare and describe what OB/GYNs believe to be the broader impact of Ohio's regulations on skill-building, skills maintenance, and professional retention of reproductive healthcare providers in the state. Authors discuss how their findings foreshadow abortion training limitations in Ohio and other abortion-restrictive states now that abortion regulations have returned to the states.
METHODS: The authors conducted four semi-structured focus groups and five in-depth interviews between April 2019 and March 2020. Participants included OB/GYNs practicing obstetrics and gynecology in Ohio between 2010 and 2020. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti.
RESULTS: Twenty attending physicians and 15 fellows and residents participated in the study. Participants discussed the impact of Ohio's written transfer agreement, gestational-limit, and abortion method and facility bans on training and skill-building opportunities. Participants felt that Ohio's strict abortion regulations 1) limit opportunities to observe and perform abortion procedures during training; 2) require learning the ever-changing legality of abortion provision; 3) limit the number of abortions OB/GYNs can provide, leading to the atrophy of their skills over time; and 4) may prevent prospective medical students and residents from choosing to study in Ohio and may lead to physician attrition from the state.
CONCLUSION: Prior to the reversal of federal protections for abortion in 2022, OB/GYNs in Ohio and other abortion-hostile states experienced barriers to training in abortion care. In returning abortion regulation to the states, access to training is likely to be increasingly restricted. This research demonstrates how abortion-restrictions hamper physicians' skills needed to care for patients, particularly in emergent situations. This puts patients at risk and places physicians in precarious ethical positions. Expanding protections and reducing restrictions on abortion will ensure OB/GYNs and trainees have the skills necessary to care for patients presenting for reproductive healthcare.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:28 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Medical education online - 28(2023), 1 vom: 28. Dez., Seite 2145104 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Gyuras, Hillary J [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Abortion |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.11.2022 Date Revised 18.11.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/10872981.2022.2145104 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM348874065 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM348874065 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226041312.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/10872981.2022.2145104 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1162.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM348874065 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36373897 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gyuras, Hillary J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The double-edged sword of abortion regulations |b Decreasing training opportunities while increasing knowledge requirements |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 15.11.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 18.11.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: The authors explore how abortion regulations in Ohio, an abortion-restrictive state in the USA, impact obstetrician-gynecologists' (OB/GYNs) training in reproductive healthcare and describe what OB/GYNs believe to be the broader impact of Ohio's regulations on skill-building, skills maintenance, and professional retention of reproductive healthcare providers in the state. Authors discuss how their findings foreshadow abortion training limitations in Ohio and other abortion-restrictive states now that abortion regulations have returned to the states | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: The authors conducted four semi-structured focus groups and five in-depth interviews between April 2019 and March 2020. Participants included OB/GYNs practicing obstetrics and gynecology in Ohio between 2010 and 2020. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Twenty attending physicians and 15 fellows and residents participated in the study. Participants discussed the impact of Ohio's written transfer agreement, gestational-limit, and abortion method and facility bans on training and skill-building opportunities. Participants felt that Ohio's strict abortion regulations 1) limit opportunities to observe and perform abortion procedures during training; 2) require learning the ever-changing legality of abortion provision; 3) limit the number of abortions OB/GYNs can provide, leading to the atrophy of their skills over time; and 4) may prevent prospective medical students and residents from choosing to study in Ohio and may lead to physician attrition from the state | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Prior to the reversal of federal protections for abortion in 2022, OB/GYNs in Ohio and other abortion-hostile states experienced barriers to training in abortion care. In returning abortion regulation to the states, access to training is likely to be increasingly restricted. This research demonstrates how abortion-restrictions hamper physicians' skills needed to care for patients, particularly in emergent situations. This puts patients at risk and places physicians in precarious ethical positions. Expanding protections and reducing restrictions on abortion will ensure OB/GYNs and trainees have the skills necessary to care for patients presenting for reproductive healthcare | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a abortion restrictions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fellowship | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medical education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medical school | |
| 650 | 4 | |a qualitative research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a residency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a training | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Field, Meredith P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thornton, Olivia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bessett, Danielle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McGowan, Michelle L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Medical education online |d 1998 |g 28(2023), 1 vom: 28. Dez., Seite 2145104 |w (DE-627)NLM097445851 |x 1087-2981 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:12 |g pages:2145104 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2145104 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 28 |c 12 |h 2145104 | ||