Value of machine learning algorithms for predicting diabetes risk : A subset analysis from a real-world retrospective cohort study
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd..
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To compare the application value of different machine learning (ML) algorithms for diabetes risk prediction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a 3-year retrospective cohort study with a total of 3,687 participants being included in the data analysis. Modeling variable screening and predictive model building were carried out using logistic regression (LR) analysis and 10-fold cross-validation, respectively. In total, six different ML algorithms, including random forests, light gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), multi-layer perceptrons and gaussian naive bayes were used for model construction. Model performance was mainly evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The best performing ML model was selected for comparison with the traditional LR model and visualized using Shapley additive explanations.
RESULTS: A total of eight risk factors most associated with the development of diabetes were identified by univariate and multivariate LR analysis, and they were visualized in the form of a nomogram. Among the six different ML models, the random forests model had the best predictive performance. After 10-fold cross-validation, its optimal model has an area under the receiver operating characteristic value of 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.823-0.886) in the training set and 0.835 (95% CI 0.779-0.892) in the test set. In the traditional LR model, its area under the receiver operating characteristic value is 0.840 (95% CI 0.814-0.866) in the training set and 0.834 (95% CI 0.785-0.884) in the test set.
CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world epidemiological research, the combination of traditional variable screening and ML algorithm to construct a diabetes risk prediction model has satisfactory clinical application value.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:14 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of diabetes investigation - 14(2023), 2 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 309-320 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Mao, Yaqian [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Diabetes |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.02.2023 Date Revised 03.02.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/jdi.13937 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM348590105 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM348590105 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226040621.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jdi.13937 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1161.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM348590105 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36345236 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mao, Yaqian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Value of machine learning algorithms for predicting diabetes risk |b A subset analysis from a real-world retrospective cohort study |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 02.02.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 03.02.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. | ||
520 | |a AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To compare the application value of different machine learning (ML) algorithms for diabetes risk prediction | ||
520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a 3-year retrospective cohort study with a total of 3,687 participants being included in the data analysis. Modeling variable screening and predictive model building were carried out using logistic regression (LR) analysis and 10-fold cross-validation, respectively. In total, six different ML algorithms, including random forests, light gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), multi-layer perceptrons and gaussian naive bayes were used for model construction. Model performance was mainly evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The best performing ML model was selected for comparison with the traditional LR model and visualized using Shapley additive explanations | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of eight risk factors most associated with the development of diabetes were identified by univariate and multivariate LR analysis, and they were visualized in the form of a nomogram. Among the six different ML models, the random forests model had the best predictive performance. After 10-fold cross-validation, its optimal model has an area under the receiver operating characteristic value of 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.823-0.886) in the training set and 0.835 (95% CI 0.779-0.892) in the test set. In the traditional LR model, its area under the receiver operating characteristic value is 0.840 (95% CI 0.814-0.866) in the training set and 0.834 (95% CI 0.785-0.884) in the test set | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world epidemiological research, the combination of traditional variable screening and ML algorithm to construct a diabetes risk prediction model has satisfactory clinical application value | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Diabetes | |
650 | 4 | |a Machine learning algorithms | |
650 | 4 | |a Predictive model | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Zheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pan, Shuyao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Wei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liang, Jixing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Huang, Huibin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Liantao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wen, Junping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Gang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of diabetes investigation |d 2010 |g 14(2023), 2 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 309-320 |w (DE-627)NLM21944952X |x 2040-1124 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2023 |g number:2 |g day:08 |g month:02 |g pages:309-320 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13937 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2023 |e 2 |b 08 |c 02 |h 309-320 |