Failing to attend versus failing to stop : Single-trial decomposition of action-stopping in the stop signal task
© 2022. The Author(s)..
The capacity to stop impending or ongoing actions contributes to executive control over behavior. Action-stopping, however, is difficult to directly quantify. It is therefore assayed via computational modeling of behavior in the stop signal task to estimate the latency of stopping (stop signal reaction time, SSRT) and, more recently, the reliability of stopping in terms of the distribution of SSRTs (standard deviation, SD-SSRT) and the frequency with which one outright fails to react to a stop signal (trigger failures, TF). Critically, the validity of computational estimates remains unknown because we currently have no direct readouts of behavior against which to compare them. Here, we developed a method for providing single-trial behavioral readouts of SSRT and trigger failures. The method relies on an adaptation of the stop signal task in which participants respond by moving a computer mouse. In two online experiments, we used movement kinematics to quantify stopping performance (SSRT, SD-SSRT, and TF), and then applied the standard Race Model and recent BEESTS model in order to examine the convergent validity of the methods. Overall, we demonstrate good correspondence between kinematics- and model-based estimates of stopping performance at the group and individual level. We conclude that the new method provides valid estimates of stopping performance that, unlike model-based estimates, can be read out at the level of single trials. Our approach might therefore be useful for interrogating single-trial neurophysiological correlates of stopping and for large-scale, online studies of behavioral stopping.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:55 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Behavior research methods - 55(2023), 8 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 4099-4117 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Hannah, Ricci [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Attention |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.12.2023 Date Revised 16.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3758/s13428-022-02008-x |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM348585535 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM348585535 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240416232201.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/s13428-022-02008-x |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1377.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM348585535 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36344774 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hannah, Ricci |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Failing to attend versus failing to stop |b Single-trial decomposition of action-stopping in the stop signal task |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 07.12.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a The capacity to stop impending or ongoing actions contributes to executive control over behavior. Action-stopping, however, is difficult to directly quantify. It is therefore assayed via computational modeling of behavior in the stop signal task to estimate the latency of stopping (stop signal reaction time, SSRT) and, more recently, the reliability of stopping in terms of the distribution of SSRTs (standard deviation, SD-SSRT) and the frequency with which one outright fails to react to a stop signal (trigger failures, TF). Critically, the validity of computational estimates remains unknown because we currently have no direct readouts of behavior against which to compare them. Here, we developed a method for providing single-trial behavioral readouts of SSRT and trigger failures. The method relies on an adaptation of the stop signal task in which participants respond by moving a computer mouse. In two online experiments, we used movement kinematics to quantify stopping performance (SSRT, SD-SSRT, and TF), and then applied the standard Race Model and recent BEESTS model in order to examine the convergent validity of the methods. Overall, we demonstrate good correspondence between kinematics- and model-based estimates of stopping performance at the group and individual level. We conclude that the new method provides valid estimates of stopping performance that, unlike model-based estimates, can be read out at the level of single trials. Our approach might therefore be useful for interrogating single-trial neurophysiological correlates of stopping and for large-scale, online studies of behavioral stopping | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Attention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Impulsivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inhibitory control | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Online | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reaching movement | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Muralidharan, Vignesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aron, Adam R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Behavior research methods |d 2005 |g 55(2023), 8 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 4099-4117 |w (DE-627)NLM157164268 |x 1554-3528 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2023 |g number:8 |g day:01 |g month:12 |g pages:4099-4117 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02008-x |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 55 |j 2023 |e 8 |b 01 |c 12 |h 4099-4117 | ||