Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock

Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..

BACKGROUND: Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) remains an understudied distinct clinical entity.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to profile a large cohort of patients with HF-CS focused on practical application of the SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) staging system to define baseline and maximal shock severity, in-hospital management with acute mechanical circulatory support (AMCS), and clinical outcomes.

METHODS: The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry includes patients with CS, regardless of etiology, from 17 clinical sites enrolled between 2016 and 2020. Patients with HF-CS (non-acute myocardial infarction) were analyzed and classified based on clinical presentation, outcomes at discharge, and shock severity defined by SCAI stages.

RESULTS: A total of 1,767 patients with HF-CS were included, of whom 349 (19.8%) had de novo HF-CS (DNHF-CS). Patients were more likely to present in SCAI stage C or D and achieve maximum SCAI stage D. Patients with DNHF-CS were more likely to experience in-hospital death and in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and they escalated more rapidly to a maximum achieved SCAI stage, compared to patients with acute-on-chronic HF-CS. In-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with greater in-hospital death regardless of clinical presentation (de novo: 63% vs 21%; acute-on-chronic HF-CS: 65% vs 17%; both P < 0.001). Forty-five percent of HF-CS patients were exposed to at least 1 AMCS device throughout hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS: In a large contemporary HF-CS cohort, we identified a greater incidence of in-hospital death and cardiac arrest as well as a more rapid escalation to maximum SCAI stage severity among DNHF-CS. AMCS use in HF-CS was common, with significant heterogeneity among device types. (Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry [CSWG]; NCT04682483).

Errataetall:

CommentIn: JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):188-190. - PMID 36752486

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:11

Enthalten in:

JACC. Heart failure - 11(2023), 2 vom: 11. Feb., Seite 176-187

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime [VerfasserIn]
Kanwar, Manreet [VerfasserIn]
Sinha, Shashank S [VerfasserIn]
Garan, A Reshad [VerfasserIn]
Blumer, Vanessa [VerfasserIn]
Kataria, Rachna [VerfasserIn]
Whitehead, Evan H [VerfasserIn]
Yin, Michael [VerfasserIn]
Li, Borui [VerfasserIn]
Zhang, Yijing [VerfasserIn]
Thayer, Katherine L [VerfasserIn]
Baca, Paulina [VerfasserIn]
Dieng, Fatou [VerfasserIn]
Harwani, Neil M [VerfasserIn]
Guglin, Maya [VerfasserIn]
Abraham, Jacob [VerfasserIn]
Hickey, Gavin [VerfasserIn]
Nathan, Sandeep [VerfasserIn]
Wencker, Detlef [VerfasserIn]
Hall, Shelley [VerfasserIn]
Schwartzman, Andrew [VerfasserIn]
Khalife, Wissam [VerfasserIn]
Li, Song [VerfasserIn]
Mahr, Claudius [VerfasserIn]
Kim, Ju [VerfasserIn]
Vorovich, Esther [VerfasserIn]
Pahuja, Mohit [VerfasserIn]
Burkhoff, Daniel [VerfasserIn]
Kapur, Navin K [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Cardiogenic shock
Clinical Trial
Heart failure
Heart replacement therapy
Journal Article
Native heart survival
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 11.02.2023

Date Revised 05.04.2023

published: Print-Electronic

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04682483

CommentIn: JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):188-190. - PMID 36752486

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM348562705