Evidence-Based Medicine : Feminist Criticisms and Implications for Women's Health

© Lea Merone et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc..

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) dates back to 19th-century Paris and started out as a new paradigm for practicing medicine, with the aim of replacing anecdote with high-quality evidence from positivist-style research. Despite the clear logic underpinning EBM, there have been numerous criticisms, including maintenance of an archaic view of evidence as "facts," failure to acknowledge that all research is underpinned by the beliefs of the researcher, and the simple fact that medical research has historically been androcentric and results generalized to female patients. In this essay, we discuss the criticisms of EBM, with a focus on feminist critiques based on three central feminist epistemologies: feminist empiricism, standpoint theory, and social constructivism. We argue that EBM potentially perpetuates gaps in women's health and advocate for incorporating feminist epistemologies into future medical research to garner further understanding of social influences on women's health. In addition, we argue that EBM may degrade the clinical acumen and that critical thinking should become a key component of medical school curricula.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:3

Enthalten in:

Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) - 3(2022), 1 vom: 28., Seite 844-849

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Merone, Lea [VerfasserIn]
Tsey, Komla [VerfasserIn]
Russell, Darren [VerfasserIn]
Daltry, Andrew [VerfasserIn]
Nagle, Cate [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Editorial
Evidence-based medicine
Feminism
Feminist epistemologies
Philosophy of medicine
Women's health

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 28.03.2023

published: Electronic-eCollection

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.1089/whr.2022.0032

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM348543387