Mortality prediction of the nutrient profile of the Chilean front-of-pack warning labels : Results from the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra prospective cohort study
Copyright © 2022 Bullón-Vela, Sayón-Orea, Gómez-Donoso, Martínez, Martínez-González and Bes-Rastrollo..
Background and aims: Front-of-Pack (FoP) nutrition labelling has been established as a policy, empowering consumers to choose healthy food options for preventing diet-related non-communicable diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the nutrient profile underlying the Chilean warning label score and all-cause mortality and to conduct a calibration with the Nutri-Score in a large cohort of Spanish university graduates.
Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study analysed 20,666 participants (8,068 men and 12,598 women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 38 years (±12.4) from the SUN cohort. Dietary food intake was assessed by a validated semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire at baseline and after 10 years of follow-up. The warning label score was calculated by considering the threshold of nutrients (sugar, saturated fat, and sodium) and energy density per 100 g/ml of product, as established by Chilean Legislation. Participants were classified according to quartiles of consumption of daily label score: Q1 (≤5.0), Q2 (>5.0-7.1), Q3 (>7.1-9.8), and Q4 (>9.8). Time-dependent, multivariable-adjusted Cox models were applied. To compare the performance of the warning label score and Nutri-Score to predict mortality, we used the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) methods.
Results: During a median of 12.2 years of follow-up, 467 deaths were identified. A higher score in the warning label values (lower nutritional quality) was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality [HR (95% CI) Q4 vs. Q1: 1.51 (1.07-2.13); p-trend = 0.010] and cancer mortality [HR (95% CI) Q4 vs. Q1: 1.91 (1.18-3.10); p-trend = 0.006]. However, no statistically significant association was found for cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, the warning label score and Nutri-Score exhibited comparable AIC and BIC values, showing similar power of prediction for mortality.
Conclusion: A diet with a higher warning label score (>9.8 per day) was a good predictor of all cases and cancer mortality in a large Spanish cohort of university graduates. Also, the warning label score was capable to predict mortality as well as the Nutri-Score. Our findings support the validity of the warning label score as a FoP nutrition labelling policy since it can highlight less healthy food products.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Frontiers in nutrition - 9(2022) vom: 15., Seite 951738 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Bullón-Vela, Vanessa [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
All-cause mortality |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 08.11.2022 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3389/fnut.2022.951738 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM348515219 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM348515219 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226040429.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3389/fnut.2022.951738 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1161.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM348515219 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36337655 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bullón-Vela, Vanessa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mortality prediction of the nutrient profile of the Chilean front-of-pack warning labels |b Results from the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra prospective cohort study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 08.11.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2022 Bullón-Vela, Sayón-Orea, Gómez-Donoso, Martínez, Martínez-González and Bes-Rastrollo. | ||
| 520 | |a Background and aims: Front-of-Pack (FoP) nutrition labelling has been established as a policy, empowering consumers to choose healthy food options for preventing diet-related non-communicable diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the nutrient profile underlying the Chilean warning label score and all-cause mortality and to conduct a calibration with the Nutri-Score in a large cohort of Spanish university graduates | ||
| 520 | |a Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study analysed 20,666 participants (8,068 men and 12,598 women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 38 years (±12.4) from the SUN cohort. Dietary food intake was assessed by a validated semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire at baseline and after 10 years of follow-up. The warning label score was calculated by considering the threshold of nutrients (sugar, saturated fat, and sodium) and energy density per 100 g/ml of product, as established by Chilean Legislation. Participants were classified according to quartiles of consumption of daily label score: Q1 (≤5.0), Q2 (>5.0-7.1), Q3 (>7.1-9.8), and Q4 (>9.8). Time-dependent, multivariable-adjusted Cox models were applied. To compare the performance of the warning label score and Nutri-Score to predict mortality, we used the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) methods | ||
| 520 | |a Results: During a median of 12.2 years of follow-up, 467 deaths were identified. A higher score in the warning label values (lower nutritional quality) was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality [HR (95% CI) Q4 vs. Q1: 1.51 (1.07-2.13); p-trend = 0.010] and cancer mortality [HR (95% CI) Q4 vs. Q1: 1.91 (1.18-3.10); p-trend = 0.006]. However, no statistically significant association was found for cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, the warning label score and Nutri-Score exhibited comparable AIC and BIC values, showing similar power of prediction for mortality | ||
| 520 | |a Conclusion: A diet with a higher warning label score (>9.8 per day) was a good predictor of all cases and cancer mortality in a large Spanish cohort of university graduates. Also, the warning label score was capable to predict mortality as well as the Nutri-Score. Our findings support the validity of the warning label score as a FoP nutrition labelling policy since it can highlight less healthy food products | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a CVD | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nutri-Score | |
| 650 | 4 | |a all-cause mortality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cancer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a front-of-pack nutrition labels | |
| 650 | 4 | |a warning label | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sayón-Orea, Carmen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gómez-Donoso, Clara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martínez, J A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martínez-González, Miguel A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bes-Rastrollo, Maira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Frontiers in nutrition |d 2014 |g 9(2022) vom: 15., Seite 951738 |w (DE-627)NLM245353895 |x 2296-861X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2022 |g day:15 |g pages:951738 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.951738 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 9 |j 2022 |b 15 |h 951738 | ||