Nasal Cannula with Long and Narrow Tubing for Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Neonates : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Cannulas with long and narrow tubing (CLNT) are increasingly being used as an interface for noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) in preterm neonates; however, their efficacy compared to commonly used nasal interfaces such as short binasal prongs (SBP) and nasal masks (NM) has not been widely studied.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating the efficacy of CLNT compared to SBP or NM in preterm neonates requiring NRS for primary respiratory and post-extubation support. A random-effects meta-analysis was used for data synthesis.
RESULTS: Three RCTs and three observational studies were included. Clinical benefit or harm could not be ruled out for the outcome of need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for CLNT versus SBP or NM [relative risk (RR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-3.04, certainty of evidence (CoE) low]. The results were also inconclusive for the outcome of treatment failure [RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.48-3.01, CoE very low]. Oropharyngeal pressure transmission was possibly lower with CLNT compared to other interfaces [MD -1.84 cm H20, 95% CI -3.12 to -0.56, CoE very low]. Clinical benefit or harm could not be excluded with CLNT compared to SBP or NM for the outcomes of duration of IMV, nasal trauma, receipt of surfactant, air leak, and NRS duration.
CONCLUSION: Very low to low CoE and statistically nonsignificant results for the clinical outcomes precluded us from making any reasonable conclusions; however, the use of CLNT as an NRS interface, compared to SBP or NM, possibly transmits lower oropharyngeal pressures. We suggest adequately powered multicentric RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of CLNT when compared to other interfaces.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Children (Basel, Switzerland) - 9(2022), 10 vom: 23. Sept. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Anand, Pratima [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 30.10.2022 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/children9101461 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM348058012 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM348058012 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226035309.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/children9101461 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1160.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM348058012 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36291395 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)1461 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Anand, Pratima |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nasal Cannula with Long and Narrow Tubing for Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Neonates |b A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 30.10.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Cannulas with long and narrow tubing (CLNT) are increasingly being used as an interface for noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) in preterm neonates; however, their efficacy compared to commonly used nasal interfaces such as short binasal prongs (SBP) and nasal masks (NM) has not been widely studied | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating the efficacy of CLNT compared to SBP or NM in preterm neonates requiring NRS for primary respiratory and post-extubation support. A random-effects meta-analysis was used for data synthesis | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Three RCTs and three observational studies were included. Clinical benefit or harm could not be ruled out for the outcome of need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for CLNT versus SBP or NM [relative risk (RR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-3.04, certainty of evidence (CoE) low]. The results were also inconclusive for the outcome of treatment failure [RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.48-3.01, CoE very low]. Oropharyngeal pressure transmission was possibly lower with CLNT compared to other interfaces [MD -1.84 cm H20, 95% CI -3.12 to -0.56, CoE very low]. Clinical benefit or harm could not be excluded with CLNT compared to SBP or NM for the outcomes of duration of IMV, nasal trauma, receipt of surfactant, air leak, and NRS duration | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Very low to low CoE and statistically nonsignificant results for the clinical outcomes precluded us from making any reasonable conclusions; however, the use of CLNT as an NRS interface, compared to SBP or NM, possibly transmits lower oropharyngeal pressures. We suggest adequately powered multicentric RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of CLNT when compared to other interfaces | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a nasal cannula | |
| 650 | 4 | |a neonate | |
| 650 | 4 | |a noninvasive respiratory support | |
| 650 | 4 | |a preterm infant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a respiratory distress | |
| 650 | 4 | |a systematic review | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kaushal, Monika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ramaswamy, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pullattayil S, Abdul Kareem |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Razak, Abdul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Trevisanuto, Daniele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Children (Basel, Switzerland) |d 2014 |g 9(2022), 10 vom: 23. Sept. |w (DE-627)NLM246337737 |x 2227-9067 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2022 |g number:10 |g day:23 |g month:09 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9101461 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 9 |j 2022 |e 10 |b 23 |c 09 | ||