Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
© 2022. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE® program with CBCT before and after surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE® Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses.
RESULTS: The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length.
CONCLUSION: Based on these results, using the R2GATE® program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:44 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery - 44(2022), 1 vom: 25. Okt., Seite 35 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kim, Myoung-Ju [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Accuracy |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 28.10.2022 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM347969534 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM347969534 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226035105.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1159.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM347969534 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36282400 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kim, Myoung-Ju |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.10.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE® program with CBCT before and after surgery | ||
| 520 | |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE® Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Based on these results, using the R2GATE® program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Accuracy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental implants | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Digital implant surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Digital surgical guide | |
| 650 | 4 | |a R2GATE | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jeong, Jun Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ryu, Jaeyoung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jung, Seunggon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Park, Hong-Ju |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oh, Hee-Kyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kook, Min-Suk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery |d 2014 |g 44(2022), 1 vom: 25. Okt., Seite 35 |w (DE-627)NLM245971963 |x 2288-8586 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:25 |g month:10 |g pages:35 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 44 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 25 |c 10 |h 35 | ||