Current immunoassays and detection of antibodies elicited by Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC..
The present study aimed to determine whether current commercial immunoassays are adequate for detecting anti-Omicron antibodies. We analyzed the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response of 23 unvaccinated individuals 1-2 months after an Omicron infection. All blood samples were tested with a live virus neutralization assay using a clinical Omicron BA.1 strain and four commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. We assessed three anti-Spike immunoassays (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant [Abbott S], Wantaï anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody ELISA [Wantaï], Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay [Roche]) and one anti-Nucleocapsid immunoassay (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay [Abbott N]). Omicron neutralizing antibodies were detected in all samples with the live virus neutralization assay. The detection rate of the Abbott S, Wantai, Roche, and Abbott N immunoassays were 65.2%, 69.6%, 86.9%, and 91.3%, respectively. The sensitivities of Abbott S and Wantai immunoassays were significantly lower than that of the live virus neutralization assay (p = 0.004, p = 0.009; Fisher's exact test). Antibody concentrations obtained with anti-S immunoassays were correlated with Omicron neutralizing antibody concentrations. These data provide clinical evidence of the loss of performance of some commercial immunoassays to detect antibodies elicited by Omicron infections. It highlights the need to optimize these assays by adapting antigens to the circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:95 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of medical virology - 95(2023), 1 vom: 07. Jan., Seite e28200 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Migueres, Marion [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Antibodies, Neutralizing |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 10.01.2023 Date Revised 08.02.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1002/jmv.28200 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM347230946 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM347230946 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226033339.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/jmv.28200 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1157.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM347230946 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36207814 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Migueres, Marion |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Current immunoassays and detection of antibodies elicited by Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 10.01.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 08.02.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. | ||
| 520 | |a The present study aimed to determine whether current commercial immunoassays are adequate for detecting anti-Omicron antibodies. We analyzed the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response of 23 unvaccinated individuals 1-2 months after an Omicron infection. All blood samples were tested with a live virus neutralization assay using a clinical Omicron BA.1 strain and four commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. We assessed three anti-Spike immunoassays (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant [Abbott S], Wantaï anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody ELISA [Wantaï], Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay [Roche]) and one anti-Nucleocapsid immunoassay (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay [Abbott N]). Omicron neutralizing antibodies were detected in all samples with the live virus neutralization assay. The detection rate of the Abbott S, Wantai, Roche, and Abbott N immunoassays were 65.2%, 69.6%, 86.9%, and 91.3%, respectively. The sensitivities of Abbott S and Wantai immunoassays were significantly lower than that of the live virus neutralization assay (p = 0.004, p = 0.009; Fisher's exact test). Antibody concentrations obtained with anti-S immunoassays were correlated with Omicron neutralizing antibody concentrations. These data provide clinical evidence of the loss of performance of some commercial immunoassays to detect antibodies elicited by Omicron infections. It highlights the need to optimize these assays by adapting antigens to the circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Omicron | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a assay sensitivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a binding antibodies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a immunoassay | |
| 650 | 4 | |a neutralizing antibodies | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Viral |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Neutralizing |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Immunoglobulin G |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miédougé, Marcel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jamme, Thibaut |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lougarre, Catherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Da Silva, Isabelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pucelle, Mélanie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Staes, Laetitia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Porcheron, Marion |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Diméglio, Chloé |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Izopet, Jacques |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical virology |d 1990 |g 95(2023), 1 vom: 07. Jan., Seite e28200 |w (DE-627)NLM000285676 |x 1096-9071 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:95 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:07 |g month:01 |g pages:e28200 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28200 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 95 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 07 |c 01 |h e28200 | ||