Arthroplasty for destroyed proximal interphalangeal joint in hand trauma surgery : Silicone hinged NeuFlex® or gliding Tactys®?
Copyright © 2022 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved..
The treatment of proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP) after a traumatic injury has produced disappointing outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional results of emergency hinged or gliding arthroplasty for destroyed PIP joints. A two-center retrospective study was carried out in 24 patients with open and closed trauma of the PIP joint of the fingers from 2007 to 2019. Fifteen hinged silicone implants (NeuFlex®) and nine gliding implants (Tactys®) were used. Pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), stability and total active motion (TAM), grip and pinch strength (Jamar®), QuickDASH and PRWE and satisfaction were assessed, and X-rays were performed. With a mean follow-up of 48 months, 24 patients aged 58 years on average were reviewed. Pain on VAS was 0.2/10, the TAM was 72% of the contralateral side, the QuickDASH was 15.6/100 and the PRWE was 24.5/100. PIP flexion was ≥50% of the contralateral side in 75% of patients. PIP and DIP extensor lag of 9° was significantly larger with the Tactys® than with the NeuFlex®, with no significant difference in the TAM. Three clinodactylies in fingers with the NeuFlex® and three reducible swanneck deformities in fingers with the Tactys® were noted. Three-quarters of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. Emergency PIP arthroplasty with Tactys® seems to provide functional results that are as good as with NeuFlex®. Clinodactyly was found with NeuFlex® use. A significant PIP and IPD extensor lag of 9° and swan-neck deformities were found with Tactys® without significant functional impairment.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Hand surgery & rehabilitation - 41(2022), 6 vom: 25. Dez., Seite 681-687 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Regas, I [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Arthroplastie |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 05.12.2022 Date Revised 03.01.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.hansur.2022.09.006 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM347073344 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM347073344 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226032944.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.09.006 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1156.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM347073344 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36191865 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S2468-1229(22)00206-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Regas, I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Arthroplasty for destroyed proximal interphalangeal joint in hand trauma surgery |b Silicone hinged NeuFlex® or gliding Tactys®? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 05.12.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 03.01.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2022 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a The treatment of proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP) after a traumatic injury has produced disappointing outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional results of emergency hinged or gliding arthroplasty for destroyed PIP joints. A two-center retrospective study was carried out in 24 patients with open and closed trauma of the PIP joint of the fingers from 2007 to 2019. Fifteen hinged silicone implants (NeuFlex®) and nine gliding implants (Tactys®) were used. Pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), stability and total active motion (TAM), grip and pinch strength (Jamar®), QuickDASH and PRWE and satisfaction were assessed, and X-rays were performed. With a mean follow-up of 48 months, 24 patients aged 58 years on average were reviewed. Pain on VAS was 0.2/10, the TAM was 72% of the contralateral side, the QuickDASH was 15.6/100 and the PRWE was 24.5/100. PIP flexion was ≥50% of the contralateral side in 75% of patients. PIP and DIP extensor lag of 9° was significantly larger with the Tactys® than with the NeuFlex®, with no significant difference in the TAM. Three clinodactylies in fingers with the NeuFlex® and three reducible swanneck deformities in fingers with the Tactys® were noted. Three-quarters of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. Emergency PIP arthroplasty with Tactys® seems to provide functional results that are as good as with NeuFlex®. Clinodactyly was found with NeuFlex® use. A significant PIP and IPD extensor lag of 9° and swan-neck deformities were found with Tactys® without significant functional impairment | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arthroplastie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arthroplasty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Articulation interphalangienne proximale | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Chirurgie de la main | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hand surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a NeuFlex® | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tactys® | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Silicones |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pluvy, I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leroy, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Obert, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bellemère, P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Loisel, F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Hand surgery & rehabilitation |d 2016 |g 41(2022), 6 vom: 25. Dez., Seite 681-687 |w (DE-627)NLM259761184 |x 2468-1210 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g day:25 |g month:12 |g pages:681-687 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2022.09.006 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 41 |j 2022 |e 6 |b 25 |c 12 |h 681-687 | ||