Realist evaluation of health promotion interventions : a scoping review
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissionsoup.com..
This scoping review aims to give a narrative account of existing realist evaluation practices in health promotion. Realist evaluations of health promotion interventions published between 2010 and 2021 were identified by searching five academic databases: Embase, Pubmed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect and Scopus. A data-charting form was created based on the characteristics of realist evaluation and four core features of an approach appropriate for evaluating health promotion interventions. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. These were classified into two types of studies: those aiming to build an initial program theory and those aiming to test an initial program theory. Our results revealed a great variety of realist evaluation practices and uncovered a growing interest in realist evaluation over the years. Our searches identified a lack of participative practice and capacity-building intention. Our examination of the data collection and analysis methods points to some common practices in using multi-methods. Perspectives on realist evaluation practices and on assessing the effectiveness of health promotion have been identified.
| Errataetall: |
ErratumIn: Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5):. - PMID 37795822 |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:37 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Health promotion international - 37(2022), 5 vom: 01. Okt. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Malengreaux, Ségolène [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Capacity building |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 29.09.2022 Date Revised 05.10.2023 published: Print ErratumIn: Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5):. - PMID 37795822 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1093/heapro/daac136 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM346818931 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM346818931 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226032348.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/heapro/daac136 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1156.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM346818931 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36166263 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)daac136 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Malengreaux, Ségolène |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Realist evaluation of health promotion interventions |b a scoping review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 29.09.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 05.10.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a ErratumIn: Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5):. - PMID 37795822 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissionsoup.com. | ||
| 520 | |a This scoping review aims to give a narrative account of existing realist evaluation practices in health promotion. Realist evaluations of health promotion interventions published between 2010 and 2021 were identified by searching five academic databases: Embase, Pubmed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect and Scopus. A data-charting form was created based on the characteristics of realist evaluation and four core features of an approach appropriate for evaluating health promotion interventions. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. These were classified into two types of studies: those aiming to build an initial program theory and those aiming to test an initial program theory. Our results revealed a great variety of realist evaluation practices and uncovered a growing interest in realist evaluation over the years. Our searches identified a lack of participative practice and capacity-building intention. Our examination of the data collection and analysis methods points to some common practices in using multi-methods. Perspectives on realist evaluation practices and on assessing the effectiveness of health promotion have been identified | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a capacity building | |
| 650 | 4 | |a collaboration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a empowerment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a program evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a review | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Doumont, Dominique |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scheen, Bénédicte |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van Durme, Thérèse |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aujoulat, Isabelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Health promotion international |d 1996 |g 37(2022), 5 vom: 01. Okt. |w (DE-627)NLM089743687 |x 0957-4824 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g day:01 |g month:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac136 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 37 |j 2022 |e 5 |b 01 |c 10 | ||