Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc..
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients' perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19.
RECENT FINDINGS: A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures.
SUMMARY: Subjective self-reported experiences ( n = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration ( n = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent ( n = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% ( n = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59%.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology - 22(2022), 6 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 371-379 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Morgan, Clare [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Immunoglobulin G |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 31.10.2022 Date Revised 22.02.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM346811112 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM346811112 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226032333.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1155.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM346811112 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)36165464 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Morgan, Clare |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 31.10.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 22.02.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients' perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19 | ||
520 | |a RECENT FINDINGS: A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures | ||
520 | |a SUMMARY: Subjective self-reported experiences ( n = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration ( n = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent ( n = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% ( n = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59% | ||
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 7 | |a Immunoglobulins, Intravenous |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Immunoglobulin G |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Jolles, Stephen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ponsford, Mark J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Evans, Kimberly |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Carne, Emily |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology |d 2001 |g 22(2022), 6 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 371-379 |w (DE-627)NLM118443127 |x 1473-6322 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g day:01 |g month:12 |g pages:371-379 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000864 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 22 |j 2022 |e 6 |b 01 |c 12 |h 371-379 |