Male or female sterilization - the decision making process : Counselling and regret
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE(S): To analyze the decision-making process of both male and female sterilization in order to improve counselling and prevent regret after sterilization in the future.
STUDY DESIGN: An online questionnaire regarding sterilization (counselling, sources of information and regret) was promoted on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. A total of 1107 men and women who had undergone or considered sterilization in the Netherlands filled in the questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 88.9 % of the sterilized group and 67.4 % in the considered group responded that they felt well informed when they considered sterilization. However, less than half of the participants in both groups knew about all different sterilization methods. In both groups participants reported they consulted their partner the most when they considered sterilization. After sterilization 7.7 % reported having regret. Regret was reported more often when participants were sterilized ≤ 30 years. Most important reasons for regret reported by males were complications, pain, a new wish to conceive and divorce/remarriage. Most important reasons for regret reported by females were pain, complications, a new wish to conceive and menstrual symptoms. A total of 21.1 % in the sterilized and 38.0 % in the considered group responded they would have liked to use a decision aid when they considered sterilization.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study provide insight in the decision-making process regarding sterilization. There is a lack of knowledge of different methods of sterilization and 7.7% regrets their sterilization afterwards. Furthermore, the results show an importance of developing a decision aid for couples considering sterilization.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:33 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives - 33(2022) vom: 12. Sept., Seite 100767 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Siemons, Sara E [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Counselling |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 13.09.2022 Date Revised 13.09.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100767 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM34545202X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM34545202X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226025102.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100767 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1151.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM34545202X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)36027724 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1877-5756(22)00073-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Siemons, Sara E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Male or female sterilization - the decision making process |b Counselling and regret |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 13.09.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 13.09.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE(S): To analyze the decision-making process of both male and female sterilization in order to improve counselling and prevent regret after sterilization in the future | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY DESIGN: An online questionnaire regarding sterilization (counselling, sources of information and regret) was promoted on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. A total of 1107 men and women who had undergone or considered sterilization in the Netherlands filled in the questionnaire | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 88.9 % of the sterilized group and 67.4 % in the considered group responded that they felt well informed when they considered sterilization. However, less than half of the participants in both groups knew about all different sterilization methods. In both groups participants reported they consulted their partner the most when they considered sterilization. After sterilization 7.7 % reported having regret. Regret was reported more often when participants were sterilized ≤ 30 years. Most important reasons for regret reported by males were complications, pain, a new wish to conceive and divorce/remarriage. Most important reasons for regret reported by females were pain, complications, a new wish to conceive and menstrual symptoms. A total of 21.1 % in the sterilized and 38.0 % in the considered group responded they would have liked to use a decision aid when they considered sterilization | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study provide insight in the decision-making process regarding sterilization. There is a lack of knowledge of different methods of sterilization and 7.7% regrets their sterilization afterwards. Furthermore, the results show an importance of developing a decision aid for couples considering sterilization | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Counselling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Decision-making process | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Regret | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sterilization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tubal ligation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Vasectomy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vleugels, Michel P H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Balken, Michael R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Braat, Didi D M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nieboer, Theodoor E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives |d 2010 |g 33(2022) vom: 12. Sept., Seite 100767 |w (DE-627)NLM204022967 |x 1877-5764 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2022 |g day:12 |g month:09 |g pages:100767 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100767 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2022 |b 12 |c 09 |h 100767 | ||