Natural History and Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology..
BACKGROUND: Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes.
RESULTS: Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival.
Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8580-8581. - PMID 36018523 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:29 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Annals of surgical oncology - 29(2022), 13 vom: 08. Dez., Seite 8566-8579 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Mor, Eyal [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 10.11.2022 Date Revised 15.11.2022 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8580-8581. - PMID 36018523 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1245/s10434-022-12370-x |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM344607682 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM344607682 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226023150.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1245/s10434-022-12370-x |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1148.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM344607682 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35941342 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mor, Eyal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Natural History and Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 10.11.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 15.11.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8580-8581. - PMID 36018523 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis | ||
520 | |a METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Mitomycin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 50SG953SK6 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Shemla, Shanie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Assaf, Dan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Laks, Shachar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Benvenisti, Haggai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hazzan, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shiber, Mai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shacham-Shmueli, Einat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Margalit, Ofer |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Halpern, Naama |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Boursi, Ben |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Beller, Tamar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Perelson, Daria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Purim, Ofer |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zippel, Douglas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ben-Yaacov, Almog |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nissan, Aviram |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Adileh, Mohammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of surgical oncology |d 1995 |g 29(2022), 13 vom: 08. Dez., Seite 8566-8579 |w (DE-627)NLM074734997 |x 1534-4681 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2022 |g number:13 |g day:08 |g month:12 |g pages:8566-8579 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12370-x |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 29 |j 2022 |e 13 |b 08 |c 12 |h 8566-8579 |