Classification system for cervical spine deformity morphology : a validation study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to initially validate a recent morphological classification of cervical spine deformity pathology.

METHODS: The records of 10 patients for each of the 3 classification subgroups (flat neck, focal deformity, and cervicothoracic), as well as for 8 patients with coronal deformity only, were extracted from a prospective multicenter database of patients with cervical deformity (CD). A panel of 15 physicians of various training and professional levels (i.e., residents, fellows, and surgeons) categorized each patient into one of the 4 groups. The Fleiss kappa coefficient was utilized to evaluate intra- and interrater reliability. Accuracy, defined as properly selecting the main driver of deformity, was reported overall, by morphotype, and by reviewer experience.

RESULTS: The overall classification demonstrated a moderate to substantial agreement (round 1: interrater Fleiss kappa = 0.563, 95% CI 0.559-0.568; round 2: interrater Fleiss kappa = 0.612, 95% CI 0.606-0.619). Stratification by level of training demonstrated similar mean interrater coefficients (residents 0.547, fellows 0.600, surgeons 0.524). The mean intrarater score was 0.686 (range 0.531-0.823). A substantial agreement between rounds 1 and 2 was demonstrated in 81.8% of the raters, with a kappa score > 0.61. Stratification by level of training demonstrated similar mean intrarater coefficients (residents 0.715, fellows 0.640, surgeons 0.682). Of 570 possible questions, reviewers provided 419 correct answers (73.5%). When considering the true answer as being selected by at least one of the two main drivers of deformity, the overall accuracy increased to 86.0%.

CONCLUSIONS: This initial validation of a CD morphological classification system reiterates the importance of dynamic plain radiographs for the evaluation of patients with CD. The overall reliability of this CD morphological classification has been demonstrated. The overall accuracy of the classification system was not impacted by rater experience, demonstrating its simplicity.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:37

Enthalten in:

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine - 37(2022), 6 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 865-873

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Louie, Philip K [VerfasserIn]
Sheikh Alshabab, Basel [VerfasserIn]
McCarthy, Michael H [VerfasserIn]
Virk, Sohrab [VerfasserIn]
Dowdell, James E [VerfasserIn]
Steinhaus, Michael E [VerfasserIn]
Lovecchio, Francis [VerfasserIn]
Samuel, Andre M [VerfasserIn]
Morse, Kyle W [VerfasserIn]
Schwab, Frank J [VerfasserIn]
Albert, Todd J [VerfasserIn]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A [VerfasserIn]
Iyer, Sravisht [VerfasserIn]
Katsuura, Yoshihiro [VerfasserIn]
Huang, Russel C [VerfasserIn]
Cunningham, Matthew E [VerfasserIn]
Yao, Yu-Cheng [VerfasserIn]
Weissmann, Karen [VerfasserIn]
Lafage, Renaud [VerfasserIn]
Lafage, Virginie [VerfasserIn]
Kim, Han Jo [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Cervical spine deformity
Cervicothoracic
Classification system
Coronal
Flat neck
Focal deformity
Journal Article
Multicenter Study

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 05.12.2022

Date Revised 15.03.2023

published: Electronic-Print

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.3171/2022.5.SPINE211537

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM344214133