Small bowel cleansing for capsule endoscopy, systematic review and meta- analysis : Timing is the real issue
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd..
BACKGROUND: The optimal small bowel preparation modality before capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is still uncertain, regarding preparation type, dose and timing of administration.
AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the small bowel cleansing in patients undergoing small bowel capsule endoscopy after fasting alone or active treatment with purgative solutions.
METHODS: We searched 4 major scientific databases from inception to December 2021 for studies evaluating small bowel preparation before SBCE. Different preparation efficacy was compared using fasting as reference. Main variables evaluated in the current study were: preparation type, administration schedule and timing.
RESULTS: 17 studies (27 treatment arms) with 2372 patients (male 47,4%) were included, mean age 54 years. Fasting alone VS overall purgative preparations pooled rate difference (RD) was 0.15 I2=81.5% p: 0.000. Sub-analysis for preparation schedule (day-before, split and same-day) and the time lapse showed that administration of PEG after the ingestion of capsule had the highest rate of adequate small bowel cleansing with a RD 0.33, administration between 1 and 6 h before SBCE had a RD 0.28, 6 to 12 h had a RD 0.21 and ≥12 h had a RD 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: Timing of ingestion was found to be critical for bowel cleansing; the shorter time laps between the ingestion last dose of laxative and SBCE, the better was the mucosal visualization.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:55 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver - 55(2023), 4 vom: 23. Apr., Seite 454-463 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Marmo, Clelia [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Cathartics |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.03.2023 Date Revised 06.09.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.dld.2022.07.002 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM344023729 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM344023729 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226021814.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.dld.2022.07.002 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1146.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM344023729 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35882577 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1590-8658(22)00584-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Marmo, Clelia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Small bowel cleansing for capsule endoscopy, systematic review and meta- analysis |b Timing is the real issue |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 28.03.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 06.09.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: The optimal small bowel preparation modality before capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is still uncertain, regarding preparation type, dose and timing of administration | ||
520 | |a AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the small bowel cleansing in patients undergoing small bowel capsule endoscopy after fasting alone or active treatment with purgative solutions | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We searched 4 major scientific databases from inception to December 2021 for studies evaluating small bowel preparation before SBCE. Different preparation efficacy was compared using fasting as reference. Main variables evaluated in the current study were: preparation type, administration schedule and timing | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: 17 studies (27 treatment arms) with 2372 patients (male 47,4%) were included, mean age 54 years. Fasting alone VS overall purgative preparations pooled rate difference (RD) was 0.15 I2=81.5% p: 0.000. Sub-analysis for preparation schedule (day-before, split and same-day) and the time lapse showed that administration of PEG after the ingestion of capsule had the highest rate of adequate small bowel cleansing with a RD 0.33, administration between 1 and 6 h before SBCE had a RD 0.28, 6 to 12 h had a RD 0.21 and ≥12 h had a RD 0.05 | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Timing of ingestion was found to be critical for bowel cleansing; the shorter time laps between the ingestion last dose of laxative and SBCE, the better was the mucosal visualization | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Small bowel capsule endoscopy | |
650 | 4 | |a Small bowel cleansing | |
650 | 4 | |a Small bowel diagnostic yield | |
650 | 4 | |a Small bowel preparation | |
650 | 7 | |a Cathartics |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Laxatives |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Riccioni, Maria Elena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pennazio, Marco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Antonelli, Giulio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Spada, Cristiano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Costamagna, Guido |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver |d 2000 |g 55(2023), 4 vom: 23. Apr., Seite 454-463 |w (DE-627)NLM108968790 |x 1878-3562 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g day:23 |g month:04 |g pages:454-463 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2022.07.002 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 55 |j 2023 |e 4 |b 23 |c 04 |h 454-463 |