Accuracy of QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay and characterization of the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-SARS-CoV-2 response : comparison with a homemade interferon-γ release assay
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to characterize the SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response detected by the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay in terms of accuracy and T cell subsets involved compared with a homemade interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (IGRA).
METHODS: We evaluated T cell response by the standardized QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 tubes (antigen [Ag]1 and Ag2) and a homemade IGRA quantifying IFN-γ response to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides (homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test). We evaluated the T cell subsets mediating the specific response using flow cytometry.
RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 66 individuals: COVID-19 or post-COVID-19 subjects and NO-COVID-19-vaccinated subjects, including healthy donors and immunocompromised subjects. The standardized kit detected 62.1% (41/66) of T cell responders. Ag2 tube showed a higher IFN-γ quantitative and qualitative response. Ag1 tube response was mainly mediated by CD4+ T cells; Ag2 tube response was mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test detected a higher number of responders (52/66, 78.8%) than the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (P = 0.056). The response was found in both T cell subsets, although a higher magnitude and response rate was observed in the CD4+ T cell subset.
CONCLUSION: The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 response is mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. A lower number of responders is found compared with the homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test, likely because of the different peptide composition.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:122 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases - 122(2022) vom: 15. Sept., Seite 841-849 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Aiello, Alessandra [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
COVID-19 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.09.2022 Date Revised 24.01.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.049 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM343986841 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM343986841 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226021723.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.049 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1146.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM343986841 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35878802 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1201-9712(22)00444-1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Aiello, Alessandra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accuracy of QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay and characterization of the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-SARS-CoV-2 response |b comparison with a homemade interferon-γ release assay |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 08.09.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 24.01.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to characterize the SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response detected by the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay in terms of accuracy and T cell subsets involved compared with a homemade interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (IGRA) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We evaluated T cell response by the standardized QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 tubes (antigen [Ag]1 and Ag2) and a homemade IGRA quantifying IFN-γ response to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides (homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test). We evaluated the T cell subsets mediating the specific response using flow cytometry | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 66 individuals: COVID-19 or post-COVID-19 subjects and NO-COVID-19-vaccinated subjects, including healthy donors and immunocompromised subjects. The standardized kit detected 62.1% (41/66) of T cell responders. Ag2 tube showed a higher IFN-γ quantitative and qualitative response. Ag1 tube response was mainly mediated by CD4+ T cells; Ag2 tube response was mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test detected a higher number of responders (52/66, 78.8%) than the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (P = 0.056). The response was found in both T cell subsets, although a higher magnitude and response rate was observed in the CD4+ T cell subset | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 response is mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. A lower number of responders is found compared with the homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test, likely because of the different peptide composition | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a IFN-γ release assay (IGRA), T cell response | |
650 | 4 | |a QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 tubes | |
650 | 4 | |a Spike peptides | |
650 | 4 | |a Whole-blood | |
700 | 1 | |a Coppola, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vanini, Valentina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Petrone, Linda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cuzzi, Gilda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Salmi, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Altera, Anna Maria Gerarda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tortorella, Carla |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gualano, Gina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gasperini, Claudio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Scolieri, Palma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Beccacece, Alessia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vita, Serena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bruzzese, Vincenzo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lorenzetti, Roberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Palmieri, Fabrizio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nicastri, Emanuele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Goletti, Delia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases |d 1998 |g 122(2022) vom: 15. Sept., Seite 841-849 |w (DE-627)NLM094730857 |x 1878-3511 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:122 |g year:2022 |g day:15 |g month:09 |g pages:841-849 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.049 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 122 |j 2022 |b 15 |c 09 |h 841-849 |