Exploring the use of a Ruthenium complex incorporated into a methacrylate-based dental material for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a blue light photosensitizer (PS), Ruthenium II complex (Ru), on the chemical, physical, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties of experimental dental resin blends.
METHODS: The experimental resin (BisEMA, TEEGDMA, HPMA, ethanol, and photoinitiator) was loaded with Ru at 0.00%, 0.07%, 0.14%, 0.28%, 0.56%, 1.12%, 1.2%, 1.5%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, or 10% w/w. Samples were evaluated for the degree of conversion (DC) after 30 and 60 s curing-time (n = 6). Selected formulations (0.00%, 0.28%, 0.56%, 1.12%) were further tested for shear bond strength (SBS) (n = 15); flexural strength (FS) (n = 12); and antimicrobial properties (CFUs), in dark and light conditions. These latter tests were performed on specimens stored for 24-h or 2-month in 37°C water. Water sorption (WS) and solubility (SL) tests were also performed (n = 12). Data were analyzed either by a one- or two-factor general linear model (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: Overall, Ru concentration above 1.2% resulted in reduced DC. In SBS results, only the 1.12%Ru resin blend samples had statistically lower values compared to the 0.00%Ru resin blend at 24-h storage (p = 0.004). In addition, no differences in SBS were detected among the experimental groups after 2-month storage in water. Meanwhile, FS increased for all experimental groups under similar aging conditions (p < 0.001). Antimicrobial properties were improved upon inclusion of Ru and application of light (p < 0.001 for both) at 24-h and 2-month storage. Lastly, no detectable changes in WS or SL were observed for the Ru-added resins compared to the 0.00%Ru resin blend. However, the 0.28% Ru blend presented significantly higher WS compared to the 0.56% Ru blend (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Stable SBS, improved FS, and sustained antimicrobial properties after aging gives significant credence to our approach of adding the Ruthenium II complex into dental adhesive resin blends intended for an aPDT approach.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:20 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials - 20(2022) vom: 01. Jan., Seite 22808000221112989 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Manso, Adriana Pigozzo [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 21.07.2022 Date Revised 21.07.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1177/22808000221112989 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM343767007 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM343767007 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226205016.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/22808000221112989 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1145.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM343767007 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35856607 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Manso, Adriana Pigozzo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Exploring the use of a Ruthenium complex incorporated into a methacrylate-based dental material for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 21.07.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 21.07.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a blue light photosensitizer (PS), Ruthenium II complex (Ru), on the chemical, physical, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties of experimental dental resin blends | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: The experimental resin (BisEMA, TEEGDMA, HPMA, ethanol, and photoinitiator) was loaded with Ru at 0.00%, 0.07%, 0.14%, 0.28%, 0.56%, 1.12%, 1.2%, 1.5%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, or 10% w/w. Samples were evaluated for the degree of conversion (DC) after 30 and 60 s curing-time (n = 6). Selected formulations (0.00%, 0.28%, 0.56%, 1.12%) were further tested for shear bond strength (SBS) (n = 15); flexural strength (FS) (n = 12); and antimicrobial properties (CFUs), in dark and light conditions. These latter tests were performed on specimens stored for 24-h or 2-month in 37°C water. Water sorption (WS) and solubility (SL) tests were also performed (n = 12). Data were analyzed either by a one- or two-factor general linear model (α = 0.05) | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Overall, Ru concentration above 1.2% resulted in reduced DC. In SBS results, only the 1.12%Ru resin blend samples had statistically lower values compared to the 0.00%Ru resin blend at 24-h storage (p = 0.004). In addition, no differences in SBS were detected among the experimental groups after 2-month storage in water. Meanwhile, FS increased for all experimental groups under similar aging conditions (p < 0.001). Antimicrobial properties were improved upon inclusion of Ru and application of light (p < 0.001 for both) at 24-h and 2-month storage. Lastly, no detectable changes in WS or SL were observed for the Ru-added resins compared to the 0.00%Ru resin blend. However, the 0.28% Ru blend presented significantly higher WS compared to the 0.56% Ru blend (p = 0.007) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Stable SBS, improved FS, and sustained antimicrobial properties after aging gives significant credence to our approach of adding the Ruthenium II complex into dental adhesive resin blends intended for an aPDT approach | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental resins | |
| 650 | 4 | |a antimicrobial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a methacrylate-based resin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a photodynamic therapy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ruthenium | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anti-Infective Agents |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Composite Resins |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dental Materials |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Methacrylates |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Resin Cements |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Water |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 059QF0KO0R |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ruthenium |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 7UI0TKC3U5 |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leite, Maria Luísa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Comeau, Patricia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dietrich, Claudia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghaffari, Sahand |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lange, Dirk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Branda, Neil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials |d 2012 |g 20(2022) vom: 01. Jan., Seite 22808000221112989 |w (DE-627)NLM215741110 |x 2280-8000 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2022 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:22808000221112989 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22808000221112989 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 20 |j 2022 |b 01 |c 01 |h 22808000221112989 | ||