Comparison of different risk stratification systems for prediction of acute pancreatitis severity in patients referred to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital
BACKGROUND: Prognostic prediction and estimation of severity at early stages of acute pancreatitis (AP) are crucial to reduce the complication rates and mortality. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the predicting ability of different clinical and radiological scores in AP.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical data from 159 patients diagnosed with AP admitted to Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019. Bedside index for severity AP (BISAP), and acute phys-iology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score at admission, Ranson and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) score at 48 h after admission were calculated. Modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI) was also calculated for each patient. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each scoring system for predicting severe AP, pancreatic necrosis, length of hospital stay, and mortality by determining optimal cutoff points from the (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: mGPS and APACHE II had the highest AUC (0.929 and 0.823, respectively) to predict severe AP on admission with the best specificity and sensitivity. In predicting mortality BISAP (with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 75.0%, 70.9%, 98.2%, and 12.0%, respectively, [AUC: 0.793]) and APACHE II (with a sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 87.5%, 86.1%, 99.2%, and 25.0%, respectively, [AUC: 0.840]).
CONCLUSION: mGPS can be a valuable tool in predicting the patients more likely to develop severe AP and maybe somewhat better than BISAP score, APACHE II Ranson score, and mCTSI.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:28 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES - 28(2022), 7 vom: 26. Juli, Seite 967-973 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Weiterer Titel: |
Üçüncü basamak bir hastanenin acil servisine sevk edilen akut pankreatitli hastaların şiddetinin öngörülmesinde farklı risk sınıflandırma sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Bardakçı, Okan [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.07.2022 Date Revised 13.09.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.14744/tjtes.2021.51892 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM34296464X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM34296464X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226015323.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.14744/tjtes.2021.51892 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1143.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM34296464X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35775674 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bardakçı, Okan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of different risk stratification systems for prediction of acute pancreatitis severity in patients referred to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital |
246 | 3 | 3 | |a Üçüncü basamak bir hastanenin acil servisine sevk edilen akut pankreatitli hastaların şiddetinin öngörülmesinde farklı risk sınıflandırma sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 04.07.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.09.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Prognostic prediction and estimation of severity at early stages of acute pancreatitis (AP) are crucial to reduce the complication rates and mortality. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the predicting ability of different clinical and radiological scores in AP | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical data from 159 patients diagnosed with AP admitted to Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019. Bedside index for severity AP (BISAP), and acute phys-iology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score at admission, Ranson and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) score at 48 h after admission were calculated. Modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI) was also calculated for each patient. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each scoring system for predicting severe AP, pancreatic necrosis, length of hospital stay, and mortality by determining optimal cutoff points from the (ROC) curves | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: mGPS and APACHE II had the highest AUC (0.929 and 0.823, respectively) to predict severe AP on admission with the best specificity and sensitivity. In predicting mortality BISAP (with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 75.0%, 70.9%, 98.2%, and 12.0%, respectively, [AUC: 0.793]) and APACHE II (with a sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of 87.5%, 86.1%, 99.2%, and 25.0%, respectively, [AUC: 0.840]) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: mGPS can be a valuable tool in predicting the patients more likely to develop severe AP and maybe somewhat better than BISAP score, APACHE II Ranson score, and mCTSI | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Akdur, Gökhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Das, Murat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sıddıkoğlu, Duygu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Akdur, Okhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Beyazit, Yavuz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES |d 2003 |g 28(2022), 7 vom: 26. Juli, Seite 967-973 |w (DE-627)NLM123640164 |x 1307-7945 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2022 |g number:7 |g day:26 |g month:07 |g pages:967-973 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.51892 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 28 |j 2022 |e 7 |b 26 |c 07 |h 967-973 |