Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes : A systematic review
© 2022 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved..
Objective: To investigate the methodological quality of published systematic reviews of factors associated with COVID-19 in people with diabetes.
Method: Systematic review with registration protocol in PROSPERO, under the number CRD42020222418. Searches were carried out from October to November 2020 in the databases of the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, Embase and Cochrane Library, in addition to searching the reference list of the selected studies. Systematic review studies with or without meta-analysis and without date and language restrictions were included. Data were extracted in a standardized way and the quality of the studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scale.
Results: Twelve reviews, published between 2020 and 2021, with a predominance of the English language, systematic reviews of observational studies with meta-analysis with a sample ranging from 6 to 83 studies, were included. Regarding financing, most of the study reported did not receive this type of support. Regarding to the assessment of the methodological quality of the studies, 3 were of moderate quality, 5 were classified as low quality and 3 with critically low quality.
Conclusions: The analyzed articles presented a bias in the preparation of reports on their studies, suggesting the need to use mechanisms to improve adherence to the established reporting guidelines and methodological evaluation tools.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:32 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Enfermeria clinica - 32(2022), 6 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 367-375 |
| Sprache: |
Spanisch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
Calidad de las revisiones sistemáticas de COVID-19 en personas con diabetes: una revisión sistemática |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Santos-Marques, Jaciane [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
COVID-19 |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.07.2023 Date Revised 04.08.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.enfcli.2022.06.003 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM342862839 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM342862839 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226015107.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||spa c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.enfcli.2022.06.003 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1142.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM342862839 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35765372 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a spa | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Santos-Marques, Jaciane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes |b A systematic review |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Calidad de las revisiones sistemáticas de COVID-19 en personas con diabetes: una revisión sistemática |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.07.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 04.08.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a Objective: To investigate the methodological quality of published systematic reviews of factors associated with COVID-19 in people with diabetes | ||
| 520 | |a Method: Systematic review with registration protocol in PROSPERO, under the number CRD42020222418. Searches were carried out from October to November 2020 in the databases of the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, Embase and Cochrane Library, in addition to searching the reference list of the selected studies. Systematic review studies with or without meta-analysis and without date and language restrictions were included. Data were extracted in a standardized way and the quality of the studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scale | ||
| 520 | |a Results: Twelve reviews, published between 2020 and 2021, with a predominance of the English language, systematic reviews of observational studies with meta-analysis with a sample ranging from 6 to 83 studies, were included. Regarding financing, most of the study reported did not receive this type of support. Regarding to the assessment of the methodological quality of the studies, 3 were of moderate quality, 5 were classified as low quality and 3 with critically low quality | ||
| 520 | |a Conclusions: The analyzed articles presented a bias in the preparation of reports on their studies, suggesting the need to use mechanisms to improve adherence to the established reporting guidelines and methodological evaluation tools | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a English Abstract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Coronavirus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Diabetes mellitus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk factors | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Oliveira-Meneses, Marilyse |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tavares-Gomes, Aline |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leite Rangel-Andrade, Elaine Maria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martinez-Riera, José Ramón |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lopes E Silva-Júnior, Fernando |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Enfermeria clinica |d 2007 |g 32(2022), 6 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 367-375 |w (DE-627)NLM171950070 |x 1579-2013 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:367-375 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2022.06.003 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 32 |j 2022 |e 6 |b 01 |c 11 |h 367-375 | ||