Analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and its trend prospect
Objective: To review and evaluate the technical advantages and disadvantages and research progress of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion.
Methods: The domestic and foreign related research literature on percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness were summarized. And the development trend of this technology was prospected.
Results: Compared with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, better improvement of low back pain in the early stage after operation, and similar long-term effectiveness, fusion rate, and incidence of complication, but a longer learning curve. The operation time of biportal and large-channel uniportal endoscopic lumbar fusion is close to that of MIS-TLIF, but the operation time of small-channel uniportal endoscopic fusion is longer than that of MIS-TLIF.
Conclusion: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has the advantages of less trauma and good effectiveness, but its learning curve is long, and indications should be strictly selected for this operation. In the future, with the continuous development and complementation of various endoscopic fusion technologies, this technology will gain better application prospects.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:36 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery - 36(2022), 6 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 653-659 |
| Sprache: |
Chinesisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhang, Bin [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.06.2022 Date Revised 16.07.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.7507/1002-1892.202202075 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM342342495 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM342342495 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226013906.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.7507/1002-1892.202202075 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1141.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM342342495 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35712920 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a chi | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhang, Bin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and its trend prospect |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 20.06.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.07.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Objective: To review and evaluate the technical advantages and disadvantages and research progress of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion | ||
| 520 | |a Methods: The domestic and foreign related research literature on percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness were summarized. And the development trend of this technology was prospected | ||
| 520 | |a Results: Compared with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, better improvement of low back pain in the early stage after operation, and similar long-term effectiveness, fusion rate, and incidence of complication, but a longer learning curve. The operation time of biportal and large-channel uniportal endoscopic lumbar fusion is close to that of MIS-TLIF, but the operation time of small-channel uniportal endoscopic fusion is longer than that of MIS-TLIF | ||
| 520 | |a Conclusion: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has the advantages of less trauma and good effectiveness, but its learning curve is long, and indications should be strictly selected for this operation. In the future, with the continuous development and complementation of various endoscopic fusion technologies, this technology will gain better application prospects | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Percutaneous endoscopy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a lumbar interbody fusion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a minimally invasive technology | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kong, Qingquan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rong, Limin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery |d 1997 |g 36(2022), 6 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 653-659 |w (DE-627)NLM093687443 |x 1002-1892 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g day:15 |g month:06 |g pages:653-659 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202202075 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 36 |j 2022 |e 6 |b 15 |c 06 |h 653-659 | ||