Perceptions and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination among Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals
Thieme. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize attitudes toward novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and to evaluate factors associated with vaccine uptake among pregnant individuals.
STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous survey was distributed to a convenience sample of pregnant individuals receiving prenatal care at two large urban academic hospitals in a single health care network in Massachusetts. Individual demographic variables were included in the survey along with questions assessing attitudes toward COVID-19 and vaccination in pregnancy. Data were analyzed using parametric or nonparametric tests when appropriate, and associated odds ratios (OR) were calculated via univariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: There were 684 surveys distributed, and 477 pregnant and postpartum individuals completed the survey, for a response rate of 69.7%. Overall, 233 (49.3%) had received or were scheduled to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Age, White race, non-Hispanic or Latinx ethnicity, working from home, and typical receipt of the influenza vaccine were associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Further, 276 respondents (58.4%) reported that their provider recommended the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy; these participants were more likely to have received a vaccine (OR = 5.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.68-9.26, p < 0.005). Vaccinated individuals were less likely to be worried about the effects of the vaccine on themselves (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.12-0.27, p < 0.005) or their developing babies (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.11-0.26, p < 0.005). Unvaccinated individuals were less likely to report that it is easy to schedule a COVID-19 vaccine (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.93, p = 0.02), to travel to receive a vaccine (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.36, p < 0.005), and to miss work to receive a vaccine (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18-0.48, p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Strategies are needed to improve patient education regarding vaccine side effects and safety in pregnancy. Policy changes should focus on making it feasible for patients to schedule a vaccine and miss work without loss of pay to get vaccinated.
KEY POINTS: · There were racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccination.. · Unvaccinated respondents were more likely to be concerned about vaccine effects for themselves or their growing babies.. · Unvaccinated respondents cited work and scheduling-related barriers to vaccination, indicating areas for advocacy.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:29 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
American journal of perinatology - 29(2022), 14 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 1489-1495 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Siegel, Molly R [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 03.10.2022 Date Revised 13.10.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1055/a-1877-5880 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM342310992 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM342310992 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226013817.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1055/a-1877-5880 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1140.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM342310992 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35709744 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Siegel, Molly R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Perceptions and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination among Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 03.10.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.10.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Thieme. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize attitudes toward novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and to evaluate factors associated with vaccine uptake among pregnant individuals | ||
520 | |a STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous survey was distributed to a convenience sample of pregnant individuals receiving prenatal care at two large urban academic hospitals in a single health care network in Massachusetts. Individual demographic variables were included in the survey along with questions assessing attitudes toward COVID-19 and vaccination in pregnancy. Data were analyzed using parametric or nonparametric tests when appropriate, and associated odds ratios (OR) were calculated via univariable logistic regression | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: There were 684 surveys distributed, and 477 pregnant and postpartum individuals completed the survey, for a response rate of 69.7%. Overall, 233 (49.3%) had received or were scheduled to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Age, White race, non-Hispanic or Latinx ethnicity, working from home, and typical receipt of the influenza vaccine were associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Further, 276 respondents (58.4%) reported that their provider recommended the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy; these participants were more likely to have received a vaccine (OR = 5.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.68-9.26, p < 0.005). Vaccinated individuals were less likely to be worried about the effects of the vaccine on themselves (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.12-0.27, p < 0.005) or their developing babies (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.11-0.26, p < 0.005). Unvaccinated individuals were less likely to report that it is easy to schedule a COVID-19 vaccine (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.93, p = 0.02), to travel to receive a vaccine (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.36, p < 0.005), and to miss work to receive a vaccine (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18-0.48, p < 0.005) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Strategies are needed to improve patient education regarding vaccine side effects and safety in pregnancy. Policy changes should focus on making it feasible for patients to schedule a vaccine and miss work without loss of pay to get vaccinated | ||
520 | |a KEY POINTS: · There were racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccination.. · Unvaccinated respondents were more likely to be concerned about vaccine effects for themselves or their growing babies.. · Unvaccinated respondents cited work and scheduling-related barriers to vaccination, indicating areas for advocacy | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a COVID-19 Vaccines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Influenza Vaccines |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Lumbreras-Marquez, Mario I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a James, Kaitlyn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McBay, Brandon R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gray, Kathryn J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Schantz-Dunn, Julianna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Diouf, Khady |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Goldfarb, Ilona T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of perinatology |d 1993 |g 29(2022), 14 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 1489-1495 |w (DE-627)NLM013020544 |x 1098-8785 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2022 |g number:14 |g day:02 |g month:10 |g pages:1489-1495 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1877-5880 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 29 |j 2022 |e 14 |b 02 |c 10 |h 1489-1495 |