A snapshot of women's and clinicians' perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor
© 2022 Waldron S. et al..
INTRODUCTION: Induction of labor (IOL) is rising globally and is growing steadily in the state of New South Wales, Australia. There are numerous methods of induction of labor, including the double balloon catheter (DBC). There is minimal evidence on women's attitudes and experiences and clinician's opinions on the use of the DBC. This study aims to explore the views regarding DBC insertion and effectiveness from women induced with a DBC and clinicians involved in the catheter insertion and care.
METHODS: This study is a descriptive survey of two prospective, de-identified, self-reported questionnaires which were completed in 2016. One questionnaire was administered to term pregnant women that were admitted to the antenatal ward post IOL, and the other was completed by midwives and obstetric doctors working in the ward at the time.
RESULTS: The DBC appeared to be a well-accepted method of cervical ripening among women (61%) and clinicians (>82%). Success of DBC to achieve an artificial rupture of membrane post removal, directly correlates to women's acceptance (61%). While most clinicians (59-67%) perceived insertion of DBC in an outpatient setting and then women discharged home was appropriate, only 13% of women were in favor. On the logistics of the procedure in respect to insertion and removal of the DBC, there were differences of opinion, with only 43% of women, 77% of midwives and 33% of doctors stating that the timing of insertion and removal needed to be improved.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to undertake qualitative research to further explore women's views and perceptions on IOL in order to ensure that clinical practice is woman-centered and evidenced-based, and to guide policy and protocol.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:6 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
European journal of midwifery - 6(2022) vom: 19., Seite 33 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Waldron, Sarah [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Cervical ripening |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 16.07.2022 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.18332/ejm/146689 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM342235265 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM342235265 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226013633.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.18332/ejm/146689 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1140.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM342235265 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35702061 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Waldron, Sarah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A snapshot of women's and clinicians' perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.07.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022 Waldron S. et al. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Induction of labor (IOL) is rising globally and is growing steadily in the state of New South Wales, Australia. There are numerous methods of induction of labor, including the double balloon catheter (DBC). There is minimal evidence on women's attitudes and experiences and clinician's opinions on the use of the DBC. This study aims to explore the views regarding DBC insertion and effectiveness from women induced with a DBC and clinicians involved in the catheter insertion and care | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This study is a descriptive survey of two prospective, de-identified, self-reported questionnaires which were completed in 2016. One questionnaire was administered to term pregnant women that were admitted to the antenatal ward post IOL, and the other was completed by midwives and obstetric doctors working in the ward at the time | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The DBC appeared to be a well-accepted method of cervical ripening among women (61%) and clinicians (>82%). Success of DBC to achieve an artificial rupture of membrane post removal, directly correlates to women's acceptance (61%). While most clinicians (59-67%) perceived insertion of DBC in an outpatient setting and then women discharged home was appropriate, only 13% of women were in favor. On the logistics of the procedure in respect to insertion and removal of the DBC, there were differences of opinion, with only 43% of women, 77% of midwives and 33% of doctors stating that the timing of insertion and removal needed to be improved | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to undertake qualitative research to further explore women's views and perceptions on IOL in order to ensure that clinical practice is woman-centered and evidenced-based, and to guide policy and protocol | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cervical ripening | |
| 650 | 4 | |a double-balloon catheter | |
| 650 | 4 | |a induction of labor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a labor and birth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pregnant women | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Contziu, Hannah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aleshin, Olga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Phipps, Hala |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of midwifery |d 2018 |g 6(2022) vom: 19., Seite 33 |w (DE-627)NLM320983080 |x 2585-2906 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2022 |g day:19 |g pages:33 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/146689 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 6 |j 2022 |b 19 |h 33 | ||