Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture : A 5- to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC..
AIM: To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 ± 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator® attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed.
RESULTS: After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 ± 1.19 mm, 0.68 ± 0.90 mm, and 1.55 ± 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups.
CONCLUDE: Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Clinical implant dentistry and related research - 24(2022), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 475-487 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chatrattanarak, Wipawan [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.08.2022 Date Revised 22.08.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/cid.13098 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM341973432 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM341973432 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226013013.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/cid.13098 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1139.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM341973432 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35675561 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chatrattanarak, Wipawan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implant and mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture |b A 5- to 8-Year prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized clinical trial |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 19.08.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 22.08.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. | ||
| 520 | |a AIM: To compare the long-term prospective clinical outcomes in a previous randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of 2 Mini Dental Implant (2MDI), 4 Mini Dental Implant (4MDI), and 2 Conventional Dental Implant (2CDI)-retained mandibular overdenture with follow-up between 5 to 8 years | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients formerly participated in the Comparative Clinical Study of CDI and MDI for Mandibular Overdenture were requested for examination of clinical outcomes. A total of 104 implants were placed with mean follow-up periods 6.64 ± 0.60 years. In Group 1 (2MDI) and Group 2 (4MDI), implants were placed and immediately loaded with Equator® attachments to retained mandibular overdenture. In Group 3 (2CDI), implants were placed and delayed 3 months for denture loading with ball attachment. The success rate, survival rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), peri-implant tissue status, prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone level change (MBLC), and patient satisfactions were analyzed | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: After 5 to 8 years follow-up, the success rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90.91%, 93.33%, and 54.55%, respectively. The success rate in Group 3 was significantly lesser than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p < 0.001). The survival rate in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 100%, 96.67%, and 90.91%, respectively, and showed no significant differences. Mean ISQ reported no significant differences between groups. Mean MBLC were 0.57 ± 1.19 mm, 0.68 ± 0.90 mm, and 1.55 ± 1.60 mm in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Group 3 reported significantly greater mean MBLC than Group 1 (p = 0.016) and Group 2 (p = 0.011), but Groups 1 and 2 were not significantly differences. The overall patient satisfactions were reported as not significant differences between groups | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUDE: Two MDI-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loaded protocol performed had favorable clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness, and overall patient satisfactions after 5 to 8 years follow-up | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ISQ | |
| 650 | 4 | |a immediate loaded protocol | |
| 650 | 4 | |a implant retained-mandibular overdenture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a long-term clinical study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a marginal bone level change | |
| 650 | 4 | |a mini dental implant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a patient satisfaction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a success rate | |
| 650 | 4 | |a survival rate | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dental Implants |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aunmeungtong, Weerapan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khongkhunthian, Pathawee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical implant dentistry and related research |d 1999 |g 24(2022), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 475-487 |w (DE-627)NLM112652921 |x 1708-8208 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g day:15 |g month:08 |g pages:475-487 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13098 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2022 |e 4 |b 15 |c 08 |h 475-487 | ||