Which Model Is Better to Teach How to Perform Tube Thoracostomy : Synthetic, Cadaver, or Animal?
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc..
INTRODUCTION: The lack of standardized skill training reported by medical students in performing tube thoracostomies may be associated with higher complications. The ideal training model is yet to be determined. This study sought to evaluate three different models.
METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, 204 last-year medical students of Universidade de São Paulo with no prior training in tube thoracostomy were randomized into three groups: cadaver, pig, and synthetic models. All groups performed 1-d tube thoracostomy hands-on training and a 40-min theoretical class. The knowledge acquisition was measured by a comparison between a theoretical test before and 3 wk after the class, and the skills improvement was evaluated by a comparison between the skills test on the same day of the hands-on training and another after 24 wk (the retention skill test). A questionnaire was submitted to evaluate their satisfaction rate and self-reported confidence, as per a Likert scale.
RESULTS: The theoretical post-test score was higher compared to the pretest score in all groups (P < 0.001). The retention skills test in the cadaver and synthetic groups decreased compared to the skills test (P = 0.01 and P = 0.007, respectively). There was no difference between the groups either in the theoretical test or in the skills test. Student satisfaction was higher in the cadaver and pig groups. The confidence perception increased in all groups after the training.
CONCLUSIONS: The models used for tube thoracostomy training appear to have a similar impact on skills retention, knowledge acquisition, and confidence. Although the satisfaction rate is lower for the synthetic model, it has no biological risk or ethical issues and is more feasible.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:278 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
The Journal of surgical research - 278(2022) vom: 30. Okt., Seite 240-246 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Meyer-Pflug, Adriano Ribeiro [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Animal model |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.09.2023 Date Revised 25.09.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.033 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM341584614 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM341584614 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226012123.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.033 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1138.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM341584614 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35636199 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0022-4804(22)00102-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Meyer-Pflug, Adriano Ribeiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Which Model Is Better to Teach How to Perform Tube Thoracostomy |b Synthetic, Cadaver, or Animal? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.09.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.09.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: The lack of standardized skill training reported by medical students in performing tube thoracostomies may be associated with higher complications. The ideal training model is yet to be determined. This study sought to evaluate three different models | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, 204 last-year medical students of Universidade de São Paulo with no prior training in tube thoracostomy were randomized into three groups: cadaver, pig, and synthetic models. All groups performed 1-d tube thoracostomy hands-on training and a 40-min theoretical class. The knowledge acquisition was measured by a comparison between a theoretical test before and 3 wk after the class, and the skills improvement was evaluated by a comparison between the skills test on the same day of the hands-on training and another after 24 wk (the retention skill test). A questionnaire was submitted to evaluate their satisfaction rate and self-reported confidence, as per a Likert scale | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The theoretical post-test score was higher compared to the pretest score in all groups (P < 0.001). The retention skills test in the cadaver and synthetic groups decreased compared to the skills test (P = 0.01 and P = 0.007, respectively). There was no difference between the groups either in the theoretical test or in the skills test. Student satisfaction was higher in the cadaver and pig groups. The confidence perception increased in all groups after the training | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The models used for tube thoracostomy training appear to have a similar impact on skills retention, knowledge acquisition, and confidence. Although the satisfaction rate is lower for the synthetic model, it has no biological risk or ethical issues and is more feasible | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Animal model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cadaver | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical student | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Simulation training | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Skill | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Synthetic model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thoracostomy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rasslan, Roberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yassushi Ussami, Edson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Salles Collet E Silva, Francisco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Otoch, José Pinhata |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bastos Damous, Sérgio Henrique |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Frasson de Souza Montero, Edna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Metidieri Menogozzo, Carlos Augusto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Edson Vieira, Joaquim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Massazo Utiyama, Edivaldo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Journal of surgical research |d 1961 |g 278(2022) vom: 30. Okt., Seite 240-246 |w (DE-627)NLM000042676 |x 1095-8673 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:278 |g year:2022 |g day:30 |g month:10 |g pages:240-246 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.033 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 278 |j 2022 |b 30 |c 10 |h 240-246 | ||