Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy : A multicenter randomized controlled trial
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd..
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE).
METHODS: Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same-day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation-related adverse events were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation-related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same-day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:37 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology - 37(2022), 8 vom: 23. Aug., Seite 1603-1609 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Sui, Yue [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Adenoma |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 05.08.2022 Date Revised 15.10.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/jgh.15901 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM341409804 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM341409804 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226011717.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jgh.15901 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1137.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM341409804 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35618650 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sui, Yue |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy |b A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 05.08.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 15.10.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND AND AIM: We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same-day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation-related adverse events were evaluated | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation-related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same-day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a adenoma | |
650 | 4 | |a adverse events | |
650 | 4 | |a endoscopy, gastrointestinal | |
650 | 4 | |a patient monitoring | |
650 | 4 | |a sedation | |
650 | 7 | |a Hypnotics and Sedatives |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Propofol |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a YI7VU623SF |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Xing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ma, Ting |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lu, Junhui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Xiao, Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Zhenzhen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wen, Qing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Guanfeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jia, Hui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cao, Fengzhen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Xiaopeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yiping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hao, Junlian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Naping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |d 1989 |g 37(2022), 8 vom: 23. Aug., Seite 1603-1609 |w (DE-627)NLM012635235 |x 1440-1746 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2022 |g number:8 |g day:23 |g month:08 |g pages:1603-1609 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15901 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 37 |j 2022 |e 8 |b 23 |c 08 |h 1603-1609 |