Short- and long-term outcomes after robotic and open liver resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma : a propensity score-matched study
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature..
BACKGROUND: Robotic liver resection (RLR) has increasingly been accepted as it has overcome some of the limitations of open liver resection (OLR), while the outcomes following RLR in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of RLR vs. OLR in elderly HCC patients.
METHODS: Perioperative data of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with HCC who underwent RLR or OLR between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A 1:2 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize the differences between RLR and OLR groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognosis factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of these patients.
RESULTS: Of the 427 elderly HCC patients included in this study, 113 underwent RLR and 314 underwent OLR. After the 1:2 PSM, there were 100 and 178 patients in the RLR and the OLR groups, respectively. The RLR group had a less estimated blood loss (EBL), a shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS), and a lower complications rate (all P < 0.05), compared with the OLR group before and after PSM. Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that advanced age and surgical approaches were not independent risk factors for long-term prognosis. The two groups of elderly patients who were performed RLR or OLR had similar OS (median OS 52.8 vs. 57.6 months) and RFS (median RFS 20.4 vs. 24.6 months) rates after PSM.
CONCLUSIONS: RLR was comparable to OLR in feasibility and safety. For elderly patients with HCC, RLR resulted in similar oncologic and survival outcomes as OLR.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:36 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Surgical endoscopy - 36(2022), 11 vom: 09. Nov., Seite 8132-8143 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhang, Xiu-Ping [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Elderly patients |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 31.10.2022 Date Revised 28.08.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00464-022-09236-4 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM340630868 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM340630868 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226005821.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00464-022-09236-4 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1135.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM340630868 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35534731 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zhang, Xiu-Ping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Short- and long-term outcomes after robotic and open liver resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |b a propensity score-matched study |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 31.10.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Robotic liver resection (RLR) has increasingly been accepted as it has overcome some of the limitations of open liver resection (OLR), while the outcomes following RLR in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of RLR vs. OLR in elderly HCC patients | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Perioperative data of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with HCC who underwent RLR or OLR between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A 1:2 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize the differences between RLR and OLR groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognosis factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of these patients | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Of the 427 elderly HCC patients included in this study, 113 underwent RLR and 314 underwent OLR. After the 1:2 PSM, there were 100 and 178 patients in the RLR and the OLR groups, respectively. The RLR group had a less estimated blood loss (EBL), a shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS), and a lower complications rate (all P < 0.05), compared with the OLR group before and after PSM. Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that advanced age and surgical approaches were not independent risk factors for long-term prognosis. The two groups of elderly patients who were performed RLR or OLR had similar OS (median OS 52.8 vs. 57.6 months) and RFS (median RFS 20.4 vs. 24.6 months) rates after PSM | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: RLR was comparable to OLR in feasibility and safety. For elderly patients with HCC, RLR resulted in similar oncologic and survival outcomes as OLR | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Elderly patients | |
650 | 4 | |a Hepatocellular Carcinoma | |
650 | 4 | |a Open liver resection | |
650 | 4 | |a Robotic liver resection | |
650 | 4 | |a Surgical outcomes | |
700 | 1 | |a Xu, Shuai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hu, Ming-Gen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhao, Zhi-Ming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Zhao-Hai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhao, Guo-Dong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Cheng-Gang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tan, Xiang-Long |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Rong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Surgical endoscopy |d 1996 |g 36(2022), 11 vom: 09. Nov., Seite 8132-8143 |w (DE-627)NLM012660159 |x 1432-2218 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2022 |g number:11 |g day:09 |g month:11 |g pages:8132-8143 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09236-4 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 36 |j 2022 |e 11 |b 09 |c 11 |h 8132-8143 |