Contralateral and Lateral Views : Analysis of the Technical Aspects of Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Insertion
Copyright © 2022, Author(s)..
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment modality for neuropathic pain. The critical part of this technique is safe access to the epidural space for lead placement. There have been innovations in radiological views, improving access to the epidural space.
Objectives: This study analyzes the adoption of these technical advantages in daily practice.
Methods: We conducted a survey of members in the Spine Intervention Society and American Society of Regional Anesthesia in regard to the practice patterns in SCS therapy. Here we present our findings regarding the use of contralateral oblique (CLO) and lateral views as well direct upper thoracic or cervicothoracic access for SCS lead insertion.
Results: A total of 195 unique responses were received between March 20, 2020 and June 26, 2020. Forty-five percent of respondents "always used" the lateral view technique while 15% "always used" CLO view for SCS lead insertion. Overall, sixty-five percent of respondents used the CLO view with varying frequency. Cervical and upper thoracic approach for cervical SCS lead placement is always or often used by 66.8% of the respondents.
Conclusions: A depth view (CLO or lateral) is always used by only 45 - 60% of the respondents and CLO view has been rapidly adopted in clinical practice for SCS lead insertion. Direct cervicothoracic and upper thoracic is the preferred approach for cervical lead placement by the majority.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Anesthesiology and pain medicine - 12(2022), 1 vom: 20. Feb., Seite e123357 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Gill, Jatinder [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Contralateral Oblique |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 19.04.2022 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.5812/aapm.123357 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM33962809X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM33962809X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226003326.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5812/aapm.123357 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1132.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM33962809X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35433387 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gill, Jatinder |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contralateral and Lateral Views |b Analysis of the Technical Aspects of Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Insertion |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 19.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2022, Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment modality for neuropathic pain. The critical part of this technique is safe access to the epidural space for lead placement. There have been innovations in radiological views, improving access to the epidural space | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives: This study analyzes the adoption of these technical advantages in daily practice | ||
| 520 | |a Methods: We conducted a survey of members in the Spine Intervention Society and American Society of Regional Anesthesia in regard to the practice patterns in SCS therapy. Here we present our findings regarding the use of contralateral oblique (CLO) and lateral views as well direct upper thoracic or cervicothoracic access for SCS lead insertion | ||
| 520 | |a Results: A total of 195 unique responses were received between March 20, 2020 and June 26, 2020. Forty-five percent of respondents "always used" the lateral view technique while 15% "always used" CLO view for SCS lead insertion. Overall, sixty-five percent of respondents used the CLO view with varying frequency. Cervical and upper thoracic approach for cervical SCS lead placement is always or often used by 66.8% of the respondents | ||
| 520 | |a Conclusions: A depth view (CLO or lateral) is always used by only 45 - 60% of the respondents and CLO view has been rapidly adopted in clinical practice for SCS lead insertion. Direct cervicothoracic and upper thoracic is the preferred approach for cervical lead placement by the majority | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contralateral Oblique | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fluoroscopy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Lateral | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neurological Injury | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Spinal Cord Stimulation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Standard of Care | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kohan, Lynn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hasoon, Jamal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Urits, Ivan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Viswanath, Omar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sadegi, Kambiz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Orhurhu, Vwaire |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Anthony C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aner, Musa M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Simopoulos, Thomas T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Anesthesiology and pain medicine |d 2011 |g 12(2022), 1 vom: 20. Feb., Seite e123357 |w (DE-627)NLM232579202 |x 2228-7531 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:20 |g month:02 |g pages:e123357 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.123357 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 20 |c 02 |h e123357 | ||