Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations : a qualitative interview study
Copyright © 2022, The Authors..
BACKGROUND: Practitioner expressions of optimism and empathy may improve treatment engagement, adherence, and patient satisfaction but are not delivered consistently amid the challenges of everyday clinical practice.
AIM: To explore primary care practitioner (PCP) views about optimistic and empathic communication in consultations; and to identify behavioural, attitudinal, and/or contextual issues likely to encourage or deter PCPs from practising such communication.
DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative interview study with 20 PCPs (GPs, practice nurses, and primary care physiotherapists).
METHOD: Semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 PCPs. Data were analysed thematically.
RESULTS: A conceptual mismatch between optimism and patient expectations became apparent; when asked how PCPs communicate about the likely effects of a treatment, answers were focussed around managing patient expectations. When prompted, it became clear PCPs were open to communicating optimistically with patients, but emphasised the need for realism. Concerns arose that patients may not be receptive to optimistic messages, especially when holding negative expectations. PCPs felt that expressing empathy is fundamental to all clinical consultations, noting that it can be challenging. Some PCPs worried that increasing expressions of empathy might increase their risk of clinician burnout and felt guilty about (appropriately) communicating empathy while maintaining some emotional distance.
CONCLUSION: PCPs agreed expressing realistic optimism during consultations could aid communication and would constitute a novel change to practice. PCPs strive for clinical empathy but can struggle to manage emotional self-protection. Specific training to help PCPs express realistic optimism and empathy, and better utilise efficient non-verbal skills could help these issues.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:6 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BJGP open - 6(2022), 3 vom: 04. Sept. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Hughes, Stephanie [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Empathy |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 24.11.2022 published: Electronic-Print Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0221 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM33909530X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM33909530X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226002136.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0221 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1130.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM33909530X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35379688 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)BJGPO.2021.0221 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hughes, Stephanie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations |b a qualitative interview study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 24.11.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2022, The Authors. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Practitioner expressions of optimism and empathy may improve treatment engagement, adherence, and patient satisfaction but are not delivered consistently amid the challenges of everyday clinical practice | ||
| 520 | |a AIM: To explore primary care practitioner (PCP) views about optimistic and empathic communication in consultations; and to identify behavioural, attitudinal, and/or contextual issues likely to encourage or deter PCPs from practising such communication | ||
| 520 | |a DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative interview study with 20 PCPs (GPs, practice nurses, and primary care physiotherapists) | ||
| 520 | |a METHOD: Semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 PCPs. Data were analysed thematically | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A conceptual mismatch between optimism and patient expectations became apparent; when asked how PCPs communicate about the likely effects of a treatment, answers were focussed around managing patient expectations. When prompted, it became clear PCPs were open to communicating optimistically with patients, but emphasised the need for realism. Concerns arose that patients may not be receptive to optimistic messages, especially when holding negative expectations. PCPs felt that expressing empathy is fundamental to all clinical consultations, noting that it can be challenging. Some PCPs worried that increasing expressions of empathy might increase their risk of clinician burnout and felt guilty about (appropriately) communicating empathy while maintaining some emotional distance | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: PCPs agreed expressing realistic optimism during consultations could aid communication and would constitute a novel change to practice. PCPs strive for clinical empathy but can struggle to manage emotional self-protection. Specific training to help PCPs express realistic optimism and empathy, and better utilise efficient non-verbal skills could help these issues | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Empathy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Primary Health Care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a general practitioners | |
| 650 | 4 | |a optimism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a physician–patient relations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a qualitative research | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vennik, Jane Louise |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Smith, Kirsten A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bostock, Jennifer |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Howick, Jeremy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mallen, Christian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Little, Paul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ratnapalan, Mohana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lyness, Emily |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leydon, Geraldine M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dambha-Miller, Hajira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morrison, Leanne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Everitt, Hazel A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bishop, Felicity L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BJGP open |d 2017 |g 6(2022), 3 vom: 04. Sept. |w (DE-627)NLM29194342X |x 2398-3795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g day:04 |g month:09 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0221 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 6 |j 2022 |e 3 |b 04 |c 09 | ||